Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31160207›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2019

Neutrophil Diversity in Health and Disease.

Carlos Silvestre-Roig, Zvi G Fridlender, Michael Glogauer, Patrizia Scapini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 333 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
333citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

333 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Neutrophils as indicators of obesity-associated inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neutrophil Subset Immunophenotyping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cas9eLife · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

273 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos Silvestre-RoigInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Zvi G FridlenderInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michael GlogauerFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patrizia ScapiniDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: patrizia.scapini@univr.it.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New evidence has challenged the outdated dogma that neutrophils are a homogeneous population of short-lived cells. Although neutrophil subpopulations with distinct functions have been reported under homeostatic and pathological conditions, a full understanding of neutrophil heterogeneity and plasticity is currently lacking. We review here current knowledge of neutrophil heterogeneity and diversity, highlighting the need for deep genomic, phenotypic, and functional profiling of the identified neutrophil subpopulations to determine whether these cells truly represent bona fide novel neutrophil subsets. We suggest that progress in understanding neutrophil heterogeneity will allow the identification of clinically relevant neutrophil subpopulations that may be used in the diagnosis of specific diseases and lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Cell PlasticityDisease SusceptibilityHomeostasisPhenotypeAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunity, InnateImmunomodulationLeukocyte CountNeutrophilsPregnancyBiomarkersimmune regulationneutrophilssubpopulations

Identifiers

PMID31160207
PMCPMC7185435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.