Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159925›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Species specific differences in use of ANP32 proteins by influenza A virus.

Jason S Long, Alewo Idoko-Akoh, Bhakti Mistry, Daniel Goldhill, Ecco Staller, Jocelyn Schreyer, Craig Ross, Steve Goodbourn, Holly Shelton, Michael A Skinner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding Influenza.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jason S LongSection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-6487
Alewo Idoko-AkohThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Bhakti MistrySection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel GoldhillSection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-5963
Ecco StallerSection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-5559
Jocelyn SchreyerSection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Craig RossInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Steve GoodbournInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Holly SheltonInfluenza Viruses, The Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Michael A SkinnerSection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-4167
Helen SangThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Michael J McGrewThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-4632
Wendy BarclaySection of Molecular Virology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3948-0895
Imperial College London · GBRoslin Institute · GBSt George's, University of London · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K002465/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013732/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013759/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R007292/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007034Wellcome Trust 205100Wellcome Trust 205100/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A viruses (IAV) are subject to species barriers that prevent frequent zoonotic transmission and pandemics. One of these barriers is the poor activity of avian IAV polymerases in human cells. Differences between avian and mammalian ANP32 proteins underlie this host range barrier. Human ANP32A and ANP32B homologues both support function of human-adapted influenza polymerase but do not support efficient activity of avian IAV polymerase which requires avian ANP32A. We show here that the gene currently designated as avian ANP32B is evolutionarily distinct from mammalian ANP32B, and that chicken ANP32B does not support IAV polymerase activity even of human-adapted viruses. Consequently, IAV relies solely on chicken ANP32A to support its replication in chicken cells. Amino acids 129I and 130N, accounted for the inactivity of chicken ANP32B. Transfer of these residues to chicken ANP32A abolished support of IAV polymerase. Understanding ANP32 function will help develop antiviral strategies and aid the design of influenza virus resilient genome edited chickens.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsHost SpecificityAnimalsCell LineChickensHumansInfluenza A virusNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseVirus ReplicationANP32A protein, humanANP32B protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseANP32AANP32Bchickengene editinghumaninfectious diseaseInfluenzamicrobiologypolymerasevirus

Identifiers

PMID31159925
PMCPMC6548507
OpenAlexW2948888443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.