ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
The DM-scope registry: a rare disease innovative framework bridging the gap between research and medical care.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Spectrum of Genetic Diseases in Tunisia: Current Situation and Main Milestones Achieved.Genes · 2021Pooled it
- Long-term experience with emicizumab in people with hemophilia A in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry.Blood advances · 2026Observational
- Sex-related phenotypic differences in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2: a nationwide registry study from Serbia.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Myotonic dystrophy family registry. The patient experience.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- The FAIR journey of a patient-driven registry: Reflections and practical solutions from the Duchenne Data Platform FAIRification experience.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Changes in RNA splicing as a surrogate endpoint for myotonic dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) clinical trials.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Myotonic dystrophy type 1: clinical diversity, molecular insights and therapeutic perspectives.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Multisystem Symptoms in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Management and Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Descriptive epidemiology demonstrating the All of Us database as a versatile resource for the rare and undiagnosed disease community.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Observational
- Patient engagement in clinical trial design for rare neuromuscular disorders: impact on the DELIVER and ACHIEVE clinical trials.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Review
- Brazilian registry of patients with porphyria: REBRAPPO study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Robust Detection of Somatic Mosaicism and Repeat Interruptions by Long-Read Targeted Sequencing in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relevance of registries as a key component for developing clinical research for rare diseases (RD) and improving patient care has been acknowledged by most stakeholders. As recent studies pointed to several limitations of RD registries our challenge was (1) to improve standardization and data comparability; (2) to facilitate interoperability between existing RD registries; (3) to limit the amount of incomplete data; (4) to improve data quality. This report describes the innovative concept of the DM-Scope Registry that was developed to achieve these objectives for Myotonic Dystrophy (DM), a prototypical example of highly heterogeneous RD. By the setting up of an integrated platform attractive for practitioners use, we aimed to promote DM epidemiology, clinical research and patients care management simultaneously.
resultsThe DM-Scope Registry is a result of the collaboration within the French excellence network established by the National plan for RDs. Inclusion criteria is all genetically confirmed DM individuals, independently of disease age of onset. The dataset includes social-demographic data, clinical features, genotype, and biomaterial data, and is adjustable for clinical trial data collection. To date, the registry has a nationwide coverage, composed of 55 neuromuscular centres, encompassing the whole disease clinical and genetic spectrum. This widely used platform gathers almost 3000 DM patients (DM1 n = 2828, DM2 n = 142), both children (n = 322) and adults (n = 2648), which accounts for > 20% of overall registered DM patients internationally. The registry supported 10 research studies of various type i.e. observational, basic science studies and patient recruitment for clinical trials.
conclusionThe DM-Scope registry represents the largest collection of standardized data for the DM population. Our concept improved collaboration among health care professionals by providing annual follow-up of quality longitudinal data collection. The combination of clinical features and biomolecular materials provides a comprehensive view of the disease in a given population. DM-Scope registry proves to be a powerful device for promoting both research and medical care that is suitable to other countries. In the context of emerging therapies, such integrated platform contributes to the standardisation of international DM research and for the design of multicentre clinical trials. Finally, this valuable model is applicable to other RDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.