Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159877›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2019

Scrutinizing the triad of Vibrio tapetis, the skin barrier and pigmentation as determining factors in the development of skin ulcerations in wild common dab (Limanda limanda).

Maaike Vercauteren, Evelien De Swaef, Annelies M Declercq, Hans Polet, Johan Aerts, Bart Ampe, Jesus L Romalde, Freddy Haesebrouck, Lisa Devriese, Annemie Decostere and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maaike VercauterenDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Maaike.Vercauteren@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-143X
Evelien De SwaefDepartment of Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Annelies M DeclercqDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Hans PoletResearch Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit-Aquatic Environment and Quality, Ankerstraat 1, 8400, Ostend, Belgium.
Johan AertsStress Physiology Research Group, Faculty of Sciences of Ghent University and Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Green Bridge Science Park, 8400, Ostend, Belgium.
Bart AmpeResearch Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Husbandry, Scheldeweg 68, 9090, Melle, Belgium.
Jesus L RomaldeDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, CIBUS-Faculty of Biology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Freddy HaesebrouckDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Lisa DevrieseResearch Division, Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), InnovOcean Site, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400, Ostend, Belgium.
Annemie DecostereDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Koen ChiersDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEFlanders Marine Institute · BEIllinois Department of Agriculture · USUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

European Fisheries Fund (EVF) VIS/15/A03/DIV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, Vibrio tapetis was isolated for the first time from skin ulcerations in wild-caught common dab (Limanda limanda). To further examine its role in the development of these skin lesions, an in vivo experiment was performed. The significance of the skin barrier and in addition the difference between pigmented and non-pigmented side were investigated. Hence, the skin of common dab was treated in three different ways on both the pigmented and non-pigmented side. On a first "treatment zone", the scales and overlying epidermal tissue were removed whereas in a second zone only the mucus was discarded. The third zone served as a non-treated zone. Thereafter, fish were challenged with V. tapetis. The control group was sham treated. Mortality, clinical signs, severity and size of the developing lesions were recorded. All animals were sacrificed and sampled 21 days post-inoculation. Significantly more fish of the group challenged with V. tapetis died compared to the control group with the highest incidence occurring 4 days post-inoculation. Fish challenged with V. tapetis developed more severe skin ulcerations. In zones where scales and epidermal tissue were removed, the ulcerations were more severe compared to zones where only mucus was eliminated. Ulcerations occurred more frequently, were more severe and larger on the pigmented side. Our data represents prove of V. tapetis as causative agent of ulcerative skin lesions although prior damage of the skin seems to be a major contributing factor. Furthermore, the pigmented side seemed predisposed to the development of skin ulcerations.

Indexed as

FlatfishesPigmentationAnimalsFish DiseasesSkin Diseases, BacterialSkin Physiological PhenomenaSkin UlcerVibrioVibrio Infections

Identifiers

PMID31159877
PMCPMC6547549
OpenAlexW2948460582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.