ArticleBMC research notes2019
Application of serial tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection to active lung tuberculosis cases in Indonesia.
Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complementary effects of acid-fast staining, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIFBMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Advances on Electrochemiluminescent Biosensors for TB Biomarkers.ACS sensors · 2025Review
- Novel automated AIMLAM for diagnosis ofFuture microbiology · 2024Article
- The Diagnostic Deceiver: Radiological Pictorial Review of Tuberculosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A case of paradoxical reaction after treatment of generalized tuberculous lymphadenopathy in a peritoneal dialysis patient.SAGE open medical case reports · 2022Article
- Differences in CT imaging signs between patients with tuberculosis and those with tuberculosis and concurrent lung cancer.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRapid detection and accurate diagnosis are very important in managing active tuberculosis because they provide an advantage in preventing further disease transmission. In accordance with the recommendation of the World Health Organization, the Indonesian Tuberculosis Control Program uses the acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear and Chest X-ray methods as the primary methods for detecting tuberculosis, especially in new cases of suspected tuberculosis. The genus Mycobacterium has many species, strains, and variants, and their natural differences may affect the clinical outcome of the diseases they induce. The purpose of this study was to assess different tuberculosis detection methods as part of serial tests and determine the best diagnostic approach for detecting active lung tuberculosis in Indonesia.
resultsThis study used clinical samples from tuberculosis patients and assessed them using a series of tests, aiming to increase the sensitivity of active tuberculosis detection. Some samples that yielded negative results in the AFB smear test were detected as positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the nucleic acid amplification test, with a sensitivity of 83.1%. Additionally, nucleic acid amplification also detected positive results among samples assessed as M. tuberculosis-negative using the culture method, this method yielded the same results as the Gene Xpert test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.