Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159799›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Tae Kyun Kim, Ankur B Bamne, Jae Ang Sim, Ji Hyeon Park, Young Gon Na

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01993758 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy of Using Lower Tourniquet Pressure During Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison With Conventional Tourniquet Pressure Group

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2013 to 2016Enrolled160ConditionsOsteoarthritisArmsLow tourniquet pressure, Conventional tourniquet pressure
NCT06575088 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Cuff Pressure Level and Protective Padding Material Selection on the Prevention of Skin Complications in Pneumatic Tourniquet Applications in Upper Extremity Surgery: Clinical Research

TypeinterventionalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsSkin Wound, Complication of Surgical ProcedureArmsStandard tourniquet pressure (250 mmHg), Limb occlusion pressure, Cotton Pad, Elastic stockinette
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae Kyun KimTK Orthopedic Surgery, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Ankur B BamnePioneer Hospital, New Panvel, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jae Ang SimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyeon ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Young Gon NaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, CM Hospital, 13, Yeongdeungpo-ro 36-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07301, Republic of Korea. orthonyg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-4328
Gachon University Gil Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher tourniquet pressures may be associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to determine (1) whether a lower tourniquet pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) + 120 mmHg] is as effective as conventional tourniquet pressure (SBP + 150 mmHg) in providing a bloodless surgical field and decreasing blood loss, and (2) whether lowering the tourniquet pressure decreases tourniquet-related complications compared to conventional inflation pressure.

methodsOne hundred and sixty knees in 124 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to either conventional (n = 80) or lower inflation pressure group (n = 80). The quality of the initial surgical field and occurrence of intraoperative blood oozing, hemoglobin drop, drained volume and calculated blood loss were assessed as efficacy variables. Safety outcome variables included post-operative pain, tourniquet site skin problems (ecchymosis, bullae, skin necrosis), and other tourniquet-related complications such as nerve palsy, venous thromboembolism, and delayed rehabilitation.

resultsA comparable bloodless surgical field was successfully provided in both groups (100% vs. 99%, p = 1.000). One case in the conventional pressure group and two cases in the lower pressure group showed intraoperative blood oozing (p = 1.000), which was successfully controlled after an increase of 30 mmHg in the tourniquet inflation pressure. There was no difference in the hemoglobin drop, drained volume, and calculated blood loss. The two groups did not differ in any safety outcomes such as post-operative pain, thigh complications, and other tourniquet related complications.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that a tourniquet inflation pressure of 120 mmHg above the SBP is effective method during TKA.

trial registrationThe trial was with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01993758 ) on November 25, 2013.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePilot ProjectsPostoperative PainPressureProspective StudiesTourniquetsTreatment FailureArthroplastyComplicationInflation pressureKneeTourniquet

Identifiers

PMID31159799
PMCPMC6547572
OpenAlexW2948034330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.