Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159753›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Conditional cash transfers to improve use of health facilities by mothers and newborns in conflict affected countries, a prospective population based intervention study from Afghanistan.

Karen M Edmond, Abo Ishmael Foshanji, Malalai Naziri, Ariel Higgins-Steele, Jane Machlin Burke, Natalie Strobel, Farhad Farewar

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen M EdmondUNICEF Afghanistan, UNOCA, Jalalabad Road, Kabul, Afghanistan. kedmond@unicef.org.
Abo Ishmael FoshanjiMinistry of Public Health, Health Economics and Financing Directorate, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Malalai NaziriUNICEF Afghanistan, UNOCA, Jalalabad Road, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Ariel Higgins-SteeleUNICEF Afghanistan, UNOCA, Jalalabad Road, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Jane Machlin BurkeMaternal and Child Health Consultant, Beirut, Lebanon.
Natalie StrobelSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Farhad FarewarMinistry of Public Health, Health Economics and Financing Directorate, Kabul, Afghanistan.
World Health Organization - Afghanistan · AFMinistry of Public Health · AFUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs on maternal and child health (MCH) service use in conflicted affected countries such as Afghanistan are not known.

methodsWe conducted a non-randomised population based intervention study in six Afghanistan districts from December 2016 to December 2017. Six control districts were purposively matched. Women were eligible to be included in the baseline and endline evaluation surveys if they had given birth to one or more children in the last 12 months. The intervention was a CCT program including information, education, communication (IEC) program about CCT to community members and financial incentives to community health workers (CHWs) and families if mothers delivered their child at a health facility. Control districts received standard care. The primary objective was to assess the effect of CCT on use of health facilities for delivery. Secondary objectives were to assess the effect of CCT on antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC) and CHW motivation to perform home visits. Outcomes were analysed at 12 months using multivariable difference-in-difference linear regression models adjusted for clustering and socio demographic variables.

resultsOverall, facility delivery increased in intervention villages by 14.3% and control villages by 8.4% (adjusted mean difference [AMD] 3.3%; 95% confidence interval [- 0.14 to 0.21], p value 0.685). There was no effect in the poorest quintile (AMD 0.8% [- 0.30 to 0.32], p value 0.953). ANC (AMD 45.0% [0.18 to 0.72] p value 0.004) and PNC (AMD 31.8% [- 0.05 to 0.68] p value 0.080) increased in the intervention compared to the control group. CHW home visiting changed little in intervention villages (- 3.0%) but decreased by - 23.9% in control villages (AMD 12.2% [- 0.27 to 0.51], p value 0.508). CCT exposure was 27.3% (342/1254) overall and 10.2% (17/166) in the poorest quintile.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that a CCT program provided to women aged 16-49 years can be implemented in a highly conservative conflict affected population. CCT should be scaled up for the poorest women in Afghanistan.

Indexed as

Medical AssistanceAdultAfghanistanArmed ConflictsCommunity Health WorkersFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesMothersPovertyPregnancyPrenatal CareProspective StudiesCash transferInequalitiesMaternal and newborn health

Identifiers

PMID31159753
PMCPMC6547596
OpenAlexW2949000087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.