ArticleBMC genomics2019
Identification of selection signatures involved in performance traits in a paternal broiler line.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Egg Hunt: Unhiding Candidate Genes for Egg Component Traits in Layers of an FAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of selection signatures and genetic diversity in the sheep.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Genomic scans for selection and runs of homozygosity in southern Italian turkey populations.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity of United States Rambouillet, Katahdin and Dorper sheep.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Runs of homozygosity and selection signature analyses reveal putative genomic regions for artificial selection in layer breeding.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genomic Inbreeding and Runs of Homozygosity Analysis of Cashmere Goat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Dissecting the genomic regions of selection on the X chromosome in different cattle breeds.3 Biotech · 2024Article
- Article
- Evidence for selective sweeps in the MHC gene repertoire of various cattle breeds.Animal biotechnology · 2023Article
- Identification of genetic associations and functional SNPs of bovine KLF6 gene on milk production traits in Chinese holstein.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Genome-wide landscape of runs of homozygosity and differentiation across Egyptian goat breeds.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Identification of Runs of Homozygosity Islands and Functional Variants in Wenchang Chicken.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Selective footprints and genes relevant to cold adaptation and other phenotypic traits are unscrambled in the genomes of divergently selected chicken breeds.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- A genome-wide scan to identify signatures of selection in two Iranian indigenous chicken ecotypes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Runs of Homozygosity in Modern Chicken Revealed by Sequence Data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNatural and artificial selection leads to changes in certain regions of the genome resulting in selection signatures that can reveal genes associated with the selected traits. Selection signatures may be identified using different methodologies, of which some are based on detecting contiguous sequences of homozygous identical-by-descent haplotypes, called runs of homozygosity (ROH), or estimating fixation index (F
resultsROH analysis identified homozygous regions of short and moderate size. Analysis of ROH patterns revealed regions commonly shared among animals and changes in ROH abundance and size between the two generations. Results also suggest that whole genome sequencing (WGS) outperforms SNPchip data avoiding overestimation of ROH size and underestimation of ROH number; however, sequencing costs can limited the number of animals analyzed. F
conclusionsIdentification of ROH and F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.