Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159732›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

EST-SSR marker development based on RNA-sequencing of E. sibiricus and its application for phylogenetic relationships analysis of seventeen Elymus species.

Zongyu Zhang, Wengang Xie, Yongqiang Zhao, Junchao Zhang, Na Wang, Fabrice Ntakirutimana, Jiajun Yan, Yanrong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zongyu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China.
Wengang XieState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China. xiewg@lzu.edu.cn.
Yongqiang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China.
Junchao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China.
Na WangState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China.
Fabrice NtakirutimanaState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China.
Jiajun YanSichuan Academy of Grassland Science, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, People's Republic of China.
Yanrong WangState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, People's Republic of China. yrwang@lzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElymus L. is the largest genus in the tribe Triticeae Dumort., encompassing approximately 150 polyploid perennial species widely distributed in the temperate regions of the world. It is considered to be an important gene pool for improving cereal crops. However, a shortage of molecular marker limits the efficiency and accuracy of genetic breeding for Elymus species. High-throughput transcriptome sequencing data is essential for gene discovery and molecular marker development.

resultsWe obtained the transcriptome dataset of E. sibiricus, the type species of the genus Elymus, and identified a total of 8871 putative EST-SSRs from 6685 unigenes. Trinucleotides were the dominant repeat motif (4760, 53.66%), followed by dinucleotides (1993, 22.47%) and mononucleotides (1876, 21.15%). The most dominant trinucleotide repeat motif was CCG/CGG (1119, 23.5%). Sequencing of PCR products showed that the sequenced alleles from different Elymus species were homologous to the original SSR locus from which the primer was designed. Different types of tri-repeats as abundant SSR motifs were observed in repeat regions. Two hundred EST-SSR primer pairs were designed and selected to amplify ten DNA samples of Elymus species. Eighty-seven pairs of primer (43.5%) generated clear and reproducible bands with expected size, and showed good transferability across different Elymus species. Finally, thirty primer pairs successfully amplified ninety-five accessions of seventeen Elymus species, and detected significant amounts of polymorphism. In general, hexaploid Elymus species with genomes StStHHYY had a relatively higher level of genetic diversity (H = 0.219, I = 0.330, %P = 63.7), while tetraploid Elymus species with genomes StStYY had low level of genetic diversity (H = 0.182, I = 0.272, %P = 50.4) in the study. The cluster analysis showed that all ninety-five accessions were clustered into three major clusters. The accessions were grouped mainly according to their genomic components and origins.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that transcriptome sequencing is a fast and cost-effective approach to molecular marker development. These EST-SSR markers developed in this study are valuable tools for genetic diversity, evolutionary, and molecular breeding in E. sibiricus, and other Elymus species.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsGenetic VariationMicrosatellite RepeatsElymusGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, RNAGenetic MarkersPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantElymus genusE. sibiricusEST-SSRs developmentGenetic relationshipTranscriptome sequencingTransferability

Identifiers

PMID31159732
PMCPMC6547490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.