ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Illumina error correction near highly repetitive DNA regions improves de novo genome assembly.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defense Systems and Prophage Detection in Streptococcus mutans Strains.Molecular oral microbiology · 2026Article
- How error correction affects polymerase chain reaction deduplication: A survey based on unique molecular identifier datasets of short reads.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Exon Capture Museomics Deciphers the Nine-Banded Armadillo Species Complex and Identifies a New Species Endemic to the Guiana Shield.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- CAREx: context-aware read extension of paired-end sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- MAC-ErrorReads: machine learning-assisted classifier for filtering erroneous NGS reads.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Sequencing by avidity enables high accuracy with low reagent consumption.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics tools for the sequence complexity estimates.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- SparkEC: speeding up alignment-based DNA error correction tools.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Genome sequence assembly algorithms and misassembly identification methods.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Is the Mutation Rate Lower in Genomic Regions of Stronger Selective Constraints?Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- CARE 2.0: reducing false-positive sequencing error corrections using machine learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
- Tatajuba: exploring the distribution of homopolymer tracts.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Testing assembly strategies of Francisella tularensis genomes to infer an evolutionary conservation analysis of genomic structures.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- PromethION Sequencing and Assembly of the Genome of Micropoecilia picta, a Fish with a Highly Degenerated Y Chromosome.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Analyzing Modern Biomolecules: The Revolution of Nucleic-Acid Sequencing - Review.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- 2-kupl: mapping-free variant detection from DNA-seq data of matched samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Integrative Analysis of Whole Genome Sequencing and Phenotypic Resistance Toward Prediction of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral standalone error correction tools have been proposed to correct sequencing errors in Illumina data in order to facilitate de novo genome assembly. However, in a recent survey, we showed that state-of-the-art assemblers often did not benefit from this pre-correction step. We found that many error correction tools introduce new errors in reads that overlap highly repetitive DNA regions such as low-complexity patterns or short homopolymers, ultimately leading to a more fragmented assembly.
resultsWe propose BrownieCorrector, an error correction tool for Illumina sequencing data that focuses on the correction of only those reads that overlap short DNA patterns that are highly repetitive in the genome. BrownieCorrector extracts all reads that contain such a pattern and clusters them into different groups using a community detection algorithm that takes into account both the sequence similarity between overlapping reads and their respective paired-end reads. Each cluster holds reads that originate from the same genomic region and hence each cluster can be corrected individually, thus providing a consistent correction for all reads within that cluster.
conclusionsBrownieCorrector is benchmarked using six real Illumina datasets for different eukaryotic genomes. The prior use of BrownieCorrector improves assembly results over the use of uncorrected reads in all cases. In comparison with other error correction tools, BrownieCorrector leads to the best assembly results in most cases even though less than 2% of the reads within a dataset are corrected. Additionally, we investigate the impact of error correction on hybrid assembly where the corrected Illumina reads are supplemented with PacBio data. Our results confirm that BrownieCorrector improves the quality of hybrid genome assembly as well. BrownieCorrector is written in standard C++11 and released under GPL license. BrownieCorrector relies on multithreading to take advantage of multi-core/multi-CPU systems. The source code is available at https://github.com/biointec/browniecorrector .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.