Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159654›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2019

Spinal subarachnoid space tapering in patients with syringomyelia.

Emily Rutan, Neel Madan, Ryan Zea, Victor Haughton

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily Rutan2 Tufts University School of Medicine, Medstar Health, USA.
Neel Madan3 Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical Center, USA.
Ryan Zea1 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Victor Haughton4 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-4628
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USTufts Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCervical spine tapering affects cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Cervical spine taper ratios derived from anteroposterior diameters reportedly differ between patients with syringomyelia and controls. We attempted to verify the differences in diameter and to show differences in cross-sectional area between syringomyelia and controls.

methodsCervical spine magnetic resonance images in syringomyelia patients (idiopathic or Chiari I related) and control patients were examined. In each subject, the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was measured at each cervical level, and C1-C4, C4-C7, and C1-C7 taper ratios were calculated. Differences in taper ratio between groups were tested for statistical significance with the

resultsEighteen patients with idiopathic syringomyelia, 28 with Chiari I, and 29 controls were studied. Chiari and syringomyelia patients had significantly steeper diameter-based taper ratios than controls. The dural sac areas tapered proportionally with the diameter-based taper ratio in all groups.

conclusionsCervical spine anteroposterior diameter tapering and dural sac cross-sectional areas tapering differ between syringomyelia patients and controls.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArnold-Chiari MalformationCase-Control StudiesCervical VertebraeChildChild, PreschoolDura MaterFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubarachnoid SpaceanatomyChiari ICSFSpinesyringomyelia

Identifiers

PMID31159654
PMCPMC6728699
OpenAlexW2948143477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.