ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
A Comparison Study of Marginal and Internal Fit Assessment Methods for Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM restorations with CAD-defined cement space: a meta-analysis of micro-CT studies.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Crowns Designed Using Artificial Intelligence Versus CAD/CAM and Traditional Methods.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- New Intraoral Scanner-Based Chairside Measurement Method to Investigate the Internal Fit of Crowns: A Clinical Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.Australian dental journal · 2026Article
- Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed permanent crowns: effect of CAD/CAM software, preparation type and resin material.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fit of three-unit anterior fixed dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by different manufacturing techniques.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of framework material on the global and region-specific fabrication accuracy and fit of 3-unit screw-retained implant frameworks.Odontology · 2026Article
- Evaluating micro-CT as a tool for advanced research in prosthetic dentistry: systematic review and meta-analysis.Odontology · 2026Article
- Discrepancy Between Surface Wear and Subsurface Fatigue Damage in CAD/CAM Composite Crowns: A Comparative Study of Intraoral Scans and Optical Coherence Tomography.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns.Odontology · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Advanced Lithium Disilicate Crowns Using Different Margin Designs (In Vitro Study).International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparison of Internal Accuracy of Ceramic Veneered Sintered Metal versus Cast Metal Restoration Upon Different Fabrication Processes.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Marginal Accuracy of Ceramic Veneer Alloy Related to Different Alloy Fabrication Techniques, Ceramic Veneering Methods, Stages, and Sites of Fabrication.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- In vitro comparison of marginal fit between CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns for primary molars.Odontology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Compatibility of Different Attachment Types Used in Orthodontic Clear Aligners with Electron Microscopy.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Restorations on Titanium Base Using Various Materials: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Marginal adaptation analysis of CAD/CAM resin crown with non-invasive methods.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Comparison of the overall fit of three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses fabricated with laser sintering and conventional casting methods.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous studies have previously evaluated the marginal and internal fit of fixed prostheses; however, few reports have performed an objective comparison of the various methods used for their assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare five marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed prostheses. A specially designed sample was used to measure the marginal and internal fit of the prosthesis according to the cross-sectional method (CSM), silicone replica technique (SRT), triple scan method (TSM), micro-computed tomography (MCT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The five methods showed significant differences in the four regions that were assessed (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.