Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159422›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2019

A Snapshot of Transdermal and Topical Drug Delivery Research in Canada.

Mahdi Roohnikan, Elise Laszlo, Samuel Babity, Davide Brambilla

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahdi RoohnikanFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada. mahdi.roohnikan@umontreal.ca.
Elise LaszloFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada. elise.laszlo@umontreal.ca.
Samuel BabityFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada. samuel.babity@umontreal.ca.
Davide BrambillaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada. davide.brambilla@umontreal.ca.
Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The minimally- or non-invasive delivery of therapeutic agents through the skin has several advantages compared to other delivery routes and plays an important role in medical care routines. The development and refinement of new technologies is leading to a drastic expansion of the arsenal of drugs that can benefit from this delivery strategy and is further intensifying its impact in medicine. Within Canada, as well, a few research groups have worked on the development of state-of-the-art transdermal delivery technologies. Within this short review, we aim to provide a critical overview of the development of these technologies in the Canadian environment.

Indexed as

Canadapermeation enhancersskintransdermal drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID31159422
PMCPMC6631132
OpenAlexW2947896903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.