Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159421›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for an Integrative Model of Health Promotion in Hospitals: Taiwan's Experience.

Ying-Wei Wang, Shu-Li Chia, Chien-Ming Chou, Michael S Chen, Jürgen M Pelikan, Cordia Chu, Mei-Hsiu Wang, Chiachi Bonnie Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ying-Wei WangHealth Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei 10341, Taiwan. drywwang@gmail.com.
Shu-Li ChiaHealth Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei 10341, Taiwan. lih.chia@hpa.gov.tw.
Chien-Ming ChouHealth Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei 10341, Taiwan. h90slamdown@hpa.gov.tw.
Michael S ChenDepartment of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan. aping.chen@msa.hinet.net.
Jürgen M PelikanCC Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), 1010 Vienna, Austria. juergen.pelikan@univie.ac.at.
Cordia ChuCenter for Environment and Population Health, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia. c.chu@griffith.edu.au.
Mei-Hsiu WangDepartment of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. u105075204@cmu.edu.tw.
Chiachi Bonnie LeeDepartment of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. bonnielee@mail.cmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-4986-0576
China Medical University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · TWAsia University · TWGriffith University · AUTzu Chi University · TWUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Health Promotion Administration of Taiwan launched an integrative certification initiative in 2016 to streamline a plural system of certifications of health promotion in hospitals. It endeavored to replace original certifications, thereby establishing the proposal of a self-assessment instrument to aid in this integration. This study aimed to verify the robustness of this self-assessment tool by conducting exploratory factor analyses through stratification, reliability tests, content and construct validity tests, and specialist evaluations, which were convened to judge the comprehensibility, applicability, and importance of the standards and measures of this tool. A stratified random sampling of 46 hospitals was performed to confirm the validity of this tool. The tool rendered a floor effect of 0% and a ceiling effect of 13%. A valid factor structure and internal consistency (α ranged from 0.88 to 0.96) in each standard were verified. Hospitals with previous certificates or with 300+ beds achieved high compliance scores. A majority of experts agreed that the sub-standards were comprehensible (≥80%), applicable (≥70%), and important (≥70%). Finally, we conclude that the self-assessment tool is valid and can serve as a reference for other countries with hospitals committed to health promotion in hospital settings.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationModels, OrganizationalFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanhealth-promoting hospitalsintegrative modelTaiwanvalidation

Identifiers

PMID31159421
PMCPMC6603959
OpenAlexW2947220933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.