Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31159215›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

A Fast and Powerful Empirical Bayes Method for Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Tianpeng Chang, Julong Wei, Mang Liang, Bingxing An, Xiaoqiao Wang, Bo Zhu, Lingyang Xu, Lupei Zhang, Xue Gao, Yan Chen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianpeng ChangInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. changtianpeng@126.com.
Julong WeiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China. weijulong128@sina.com.
Mang LiangInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. liangmangbj@126.com.
Bingxing AnInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. ABX2HF@126.com.
Xiaoqiao WangInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. longmao7@live.com.
Bo ZhuInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. zhubo525@126.com.
Lingyang XuInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. xulingyang@caas.cn.
Lupei ZhangInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. zhanglupei@caas.cn.
Xue GaoInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. gaoxue76@126.com.
Yan ChenInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. chenyan0204@163.com.
Junya LiInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. lijunya@caas.cn.
Huijiang GaoInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. gaohuijiang@caas.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Technology Innovation Project-Cattle Breeding ASTIP-IAS03Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Technology Innovation Project-Cattle Breeding CAAS-XTCX2016010National Natural Science Foundation of China 31572376National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672384National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear mixed model (LMM) is an efficient method for GWAS. There are numerous forms of LMM-based GWAS methods. However, improving statistical power and computing efficiency have always been the research hotspots of the LMM-based GWAS methods. Here, we proposed a fast empirical Bayes method, which is based on linear mixed models. We call it Fast-EB-LMM in short. The novelty of this method is that it uses a modified kinship matrix accounting for individual relatedness to avoid competition between the locus of interest and its counterpart in the polygene. This property has increased statistical power. We adopted two special algorithms to ease the computational burden: Eigenvalue decomposition and Woodbury matrix identity. Simulation studies showed that Fast-EB-LMM has significantly increased statistical power of marker detection and improved computational efficiency compared with two widely used GWAS methods, EMMA and EB. Real data analyses for two carcass traits in a Chinese Simmental beef cattle population showed that the significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and candidate genes identified by Fast-EB-LMM are highly consistent with results of previous studies. We therefore believe that the Fast-EB-LMM method is a reliable and efficient method for GWAS.

Indexed as

empirical Bayesgenome-wide association studykinship matrixlinear mixed modelproximal contamination

Identifiers

PMID31159215
PMCPMC6616871
OpenAlexW2947333829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.