SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2019
Brain vascular changes in adults with congenital heart disease: A systematic review.
Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain volumes in congenital heart disease from childhood to adulthood: A pooled neuroimaging study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Genetics and Brain Health in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Consensus Statement From the ACHD/Neuro 2024 Conference.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Design and Harmonization Approach for the Multi-Institutional Neurocognitive Discovery Study (MINDS) of Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) Neuroimaging Ancillary Study: A Technical Note.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Altered white matter connectivity in children with congenital heart disease with single ventricle physiology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Born to Age: When Adult Congenital Heart Disease Converges With Geroscience.JACC. Advances · 2022Review
- Brain volumes in adults with congenital heart disease correlate with executive function abilities.Brain imaging and behavior · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Less information is available on brain integrity in adults with congenital heart disease than on brain changes in newborns and children with heart defects. Nevertheless, the number of adults with congenital heart disease is increasing rapidly and it has been shown that adults with congenital heart disease develop dementia almost twice as frequently as adults in the general population. In the context of a rapidly growing congenital heart disease population, neuroradiological-oriented investigations of biomarkers distinctive for vascular damage, brain aging, and possible cognitive impairment is a crucial challenge. We provide an overview of the existing literature on neuroimaging studies in adults with congenital heart disease and discuss methodology issues to further investigate this subject. Overall, we aim to raise awareness of the importance of brain health studies in adults with congenital heart disease given the likely increasing impact on social and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.