Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158267›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Predicting cochlear dead regions in patients with hearing loss through a machine learning-based approach: A preliminary study.

Young-Soo Chang, Heesung Park, Sung Hwa Hong, Won-Ho Chung, Yang-Sun Cho, Il Joon Moon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Young-Soo ChangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Heesung ParkHearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hwa HongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
Won-Ho ChungDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yang-Sun ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Il Joon MoonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3613-0734
Samsung Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting cochlear dead regions (DRs) in patients with hearing loss of various etiologies. Five hundred and fifty-five ears from 380 patients (3,770 test samples) diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) were analyzed. A threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test was applied to detect the presence of DRs. Data were collected on sex, age, side of the affected ear, hearing loss etiology, word recognition scores (WRS), and pure-tone thresholds at each frequency. According to the cause of hearing loss as diagnosed by the physician, we categorized the patients into six groups: 1) SNHL with unknown etiology; 2) sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL); 3) vestibular schwannoma (VS); 4) Meniere's disease (MD); 5) noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL); or 6) presbycusis or age-related hearing loss (ARHL). To develop a predictive model, we performed recursive partitioning and regression for classification, logistic regression, and random forest. The overall prevalence of one or more DRs in test ears was 20.36% (113 ears). Among the 3,770 test samples, the overall frequency-specific prevalence of DR was 6.7%. WRS, pure-tone thresholds at each frequency, disease type (VS or MD), and frequency information were useful for predicting DRs. Sex and age were not associated with detecting DRs. Based on these results, we suggest possible predictive factors for determining the presence of DRs. To improve the predictive power of the model, a more flexible model or more clinical features, such as the duration of hearing loss or risk factors for developing DRs, may be needed.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAuditory ThresholdCochleaFemaleHearing LossHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNoiseYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31158267
PMCPMC6546232
OpenAlexW2948348485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.