Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158253›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan.

Fadil Elamin, Nihal Abdelazeem, Isra Salah, Yousra Mirghani, Ferranti Wong

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03640013 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Hall vs Conventional Technique in Placing Preformed Metal Crowns From Sudan

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhartoum Centre for Research and Medical TrainingRan2015 to 2018Enrolled103ConditionsCaries, DentalArmsHall Technique PMC
NCT04889196 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Efficiency and Gingival Health Status of Hall Versus SDF Techniques in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSarah Abdalla Ibrahim AbdallaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsCariesArmsSilver diamine fluoride, hall technique
NCT06012409 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Occlusal Effects of the Hall Technique and Investigation of Children's Satisfaction

TypeobservationalSponsorAydin Adnan Menderes UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled39ConditionsDental Caries in ChildrenArmsHall Technique Prefabricated Metal Crown
NCT06350578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Analysis of Hall Technique and Conventional Method for Stainless Steel Crown Placement in Primary Molars With Approximal Caries: A Randomized Controlled Trial at Primary Healthcare Corporation, Qatar

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrimary Health Care Corporation, QatarRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsApproximal Dental Caries (ICDAS 3-5) in Primary Molars of ChildrenArmsHall Crown Technique, Conventional SSC Technique
NCT07447583 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An 18-Month Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Hall Technique, Silver Diamine Fluoride, and Compomer Restorations for the Management of Caries in Primary Molars in Children Aged 4-8 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsDental CariesArmsHall Technique, Silver diamine Fluoride 38%, Compomer Restoration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Success rate and acceptability of conventional and modified hall crowns among children and parents: a randomised clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Association between lesion depth and placement technique with failures requiring extraction of preformed metal crowns in primary molars. A retrospective study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  12. The Hall technique: knowledge, practice, and concerns of dentists in primary care settings in the State of Qatar-a questionnaire-based survey.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Hall technique versus conventional preformed metal crowns: can paediatric dentists tell the difference on radiographs?European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fadil ElaminQueen Mary University of London, Institute of Dentistry, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-7861
Nihal AbdelazeemKhartoum Centre for Research and Medical Training, Khartoum, Sudan.
Isra SalahKhartoum Centre for Research and Medical Training, Khartoum, Sudan.
Yousra MirghaniKhartoum Centre for Research and Medical Training, Khartoum, Sudan.
Ferranti WongQueen Mary University of London, Institute of Dentistry, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high success rates of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) in children no randomized clinical trials compare methods of placement and none describe its use in Africa. Our aim was to compare survival and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by conventional techniques (CT) and biological Hall techniques (HT) using a prospective randomized control trial in a general dental practice from Khartoum. One hundred and nine and 103 PMCs were placed in randomly selected children (5-8years) with 1-2 carious primary molars using HT and CT respectively and followed for 2 years. Socioeconomic status, periodontal health, occlusion, anxiety, and procedure time were compared using student t-test. Kaplan-Meier survival rates and incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between CT and HT. CT and HT groups were similar for age, gender, socio-economic status. Survival rates were high (over 90%) for both study arms and not statistically different (p>0.05). Anxiety scores were significantly higher in CT arm after 12 months compared to HT (p<0.001). Clinically, gingival and plaque indices were similar between groups (p>0.05) but occlusions were raised in nearly all subjects in the HT arm (p<0.05). Periodontal health improved, and occlusions adjusted over time in both arms. There were 3 (2.7%) and 6 (5.8%) minor failures, 7 (6.4%) and 6 (5.8%) major failures in HT and CT arms respectively. Mean procedure time was lower in HT (9.1 min) than CT (33.9 min); p<0.001. Mean PMC cost was US$2.45 and US$7.81 for HT and CT respectively. The ICER was US$136.56 more for each PMC placed by CT per life year. We show that PMCs have high survival outcomes in disadvantaged populations similar to results from developed countries. As HT can be carried out by less experienced dental operators and therapists, this biological approach provides a promising cost-effective option to manage caries in developing countries with limited resources. Trial registration: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT03640013.

Indexed as

CrownsChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDental AnxietyDental Plaque IndexDental Restoration, PermanentFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMetalsMetals

Identifiers

PMID31158253
PMCPMC6546341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.