Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158248›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

More subjects are required for ventrolateral than dorsolateral prefrontal TMS because of intolerability and potential drop-out.

Shuyan Han, Akitoshi Ogawa, Takahiro Osada, Akimitsu Suda, Masaki Tanaka, Hitoshi Nanjo, Yasushi Shimo, Nobutaka Hattori, Seiki Konishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuyan HanDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akitoshi OgawaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-445X
Takahiro OsadaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-3200
Akimitsu SudaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki TanakaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi NanjoDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi ShimoDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutaka HattoriDepartment of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiki KonishiDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3645-5408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human lateral prefrontal cortex, particularly the ventral region, often causes considerable discomfort to subjects. To date, in contrast to abundant literature on stimulations to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex has been less frequently stimulated, partly because some subjects are intolerable of stimulation to the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. To predict the additional number of subjects required for the stimulation of the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices, 20 young healthy subjects reported two evaluation scores: the discomfort caused by TMS and the resulting intolerability to complete the TMS experiments. Single-pulse stimulation (SPS) or theta-burst stimulation (TBS) was administered to the lateral prefrontal cortex. The high-resolution extended 10-20 system was used to provide accurate estimation of the voxelwise scores. The discomfort ratings with the SPS and TBS were relatively higher in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex than those in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Both the SPS and TBS elicited maximal discomfort at the stimulation position F8. The SPS and TBS to F8 under the standard TMS protocols were intolerable for approximately one half (11 and 10, respectively) of the subjects. The intolerability was further calculated for all voxels in the lateral prefrontal cortex, which enabled us to estimate the additional number of subjects required for specific target areas. These results suggest that prior knowledge of subjects' discomfort during stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex can be of practical use in the experimental planning of the appropriate number of recruited subjects and provide the database for the probability of intolerability that can be used to predict the additional number of subjects.

Indexed as

Patient DropoutsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31158248
PMCPMC6546272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.