Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158230›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2019

Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial.

Ivan Jambor, Janne Verho, Otto Ettala, Juha Knaapila, Pekka Taimen, Kari T Syvänen, Aida Kiviniemi, Esa Kähkönen, Ileana Montoya Perez, Marjo Seppänen and 12 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01864135 nacompletednot on this map

Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis - Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2013 to 2015Enrolled175ConditionsProstate CancerArms3T MRI (Magnetom Verio 3T, Erlangen, Germany), Transrectal ultrasound (Bk Medical Pro Focus Ultraview 2202 system)
NCT02241122 nacompletednot on this map

Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis - Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies and Biomarkers (Multi-institutional Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled350ConditionsProstate CancerArmsprostate biopsy
NCT05384535 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Utility of Biparametric MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) as a Screening Tool for Prostate Cancer in a High-Risk Cohort

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2022 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsProstate Cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Population at RiskArmsBi-parametric MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan JamborDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-3570
Janne VerhoDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9701-1715
Otto EttalaDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-4602
Juha KnaapilaDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-9668
Pekka TaimenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8849-4604
Kari T SyvänenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7832-7471
Aida KiviniemiDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-8270
Esa KähkönenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ileana Montoya PerezDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9744-9204
Marjo SeppänenDepartment of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland.
Antti RannikkoDepartment of Urology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-3484
Outi OksanenDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jarno RiikonenDepartment of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Sanna Mari VimpeliDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tommi KaukoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Harri MerisaariDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8515-5399
Markku KallajokiInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tuomas MirttiDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tarja LamminenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jani SaunavaaraDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0617-1105
Hannu J AronenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3647-0015
University of Turku · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FISatakunta Central Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND

findingsThe aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3-5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy-including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value-of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%-98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings.

conclusionsIMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122.

Indexed as

AgedFinlandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31158230
PMCPMC6546206
OpenAlexW2948966189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.