Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158228›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Laboratory evolution reveals a two-dimensional rate-yield tradeoff in microbial metabolism.

Chuankai Cheng, Edward J O'Brien, Douglas McCloskey, Jose Utrilla, Connor Olson, Ryan A LaCroix, Troy E Sandberg, Adam M Feist, Bernhard O Palsson, Zachary A King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Integrative Thermodynamic Strategies in Microbial Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Nutrient colimitation is a quantitative, dynamic property of microbial populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Energetic scaling in microbial growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chuankai ChengDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-8916
Edward J O'BrienDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Douglas McCloskeyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Jose UtrillaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3048-9241
Connor OlsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ryan A LaCroixDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Troy E SandbergDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Adam M FeistDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Zachary A KingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-1499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth rate and yield are fundamental features of microbial growth. However, we lack a mechanistic and quantitative understanding of the rate-yield relationship. Studies pairing computational predictions with experiments have shown the importance of maintenance energy and proteome allocation in explaining rate-yield tradeoffs and overflow metabolism. Recently, adaptive evolution experiments of Escherichia coli reveal a phenotypic diversity beyond what has been explained using simple models of growth rate versus yield. Here, we identify a two-dimensional rate-yield tradeoff in adapted E. coli strains where the dimensions are (A) a tradeoff between growth rate and yield and (B) a tradeoff between substrate (glucose) uptake rate and growth yield. We employ a multi-scale modeling approach, combining a previously reported coarse-grained small-scale proteome allocation model with a fine-grained genome-scale model of metabolism and gene expression (ME-model), to develop a quantitative description of the full rate-yield relationship for E. coli K-12 MG1655. The multi-scale analysis resolves the complexity of ME-model which hindered its practical use in proteome complexity analysis, and provides a mechanistic explanation of the two-dimensional tradeoff. Further, the analysis identifies modifications to the P/O ratio and the flux allocation between glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) as potential mechanisms that enable the tradeoff between glucose uptake rate and growth yield. Thus, the rate-yield tradeoffs that govern microbial adaptation to new environments are more complex than previously reported, and they can be understood in mechanistic detail using a multi-scale modeling approach.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialModels, BiologicalProteomeSystems BiologyBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID31158228
PMCPMC6564042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.