Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31158047›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Classical and novel strategies to develop a

Louis-Antoine Barel, Laurence A Mulard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of themSphere · 2023
    Article
  3. Toward aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Shigella Outer Membrane Vesicles as Promising Targets for Vaccination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Impact of O-Acetylation onMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  20. Comparison and Optimization of Quantification Methods forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louis-Antoine Barela Chemistry of Biomolecules Unit, Department of Structural Biology and Chemistry , Institut Pasteur, UMR3523, CNRS , Paris , France.
Laurence A Mularda Chemistry of Biomolecules Unit, Department of Structural Biology and Chemistry , Institut Pasteur, UMR3523, CNRS , Paris , France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCarbohydratesClinical Trials as TopicDysentery, BacillaryGlycoconjugatesHumansShigellaShigella VaccinesVaccines, ConjugateAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCarbohydratesGlycoconjugatesShigella VaccinesVaccines, ConjugateBioconjugatecarbohydrate antigenclinical trialglycanglycoconjugatelipopolysaccharideO-acetylationoligosaccharideShigellavaccine

Identifiers

PMID31158047
PMCPMC6663142
OpenAlexW2948937493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.