Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157656›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in supportive and palliative care2019

Caring for the informal cancer caregiver.

Virginia Sun, Dan J Raz, Jae Y Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Non-pharmacological interventions for informal cancer caregivers: a JBI scoping review and gap analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Quality of life dynamics in the gastric cancer dyad: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis guiding the development of a family-centered nursing framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  10. From Willingness to Readiness: Caregiver Activation for Cancer Care in Singapore.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Examining the quality of life in caregivers of patients with urologic cancer: A cross-sectional study in Crete, Greece.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Virginia SunDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope.
Dan J RazDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Jae Y KimDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health Domains on Lung Cancer Surgery Family Caregivers and PatientsR01CA217841 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI KIM, JAE, SUN, VIRGINIA CHIH-YI · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewInformal cancer caregivers play a vital role in the physical, functional, and emotional well being of cancer patients. However, the majority of informal caregivers are not prepared for their caregiving role. We reviewed and synthesized the recent literature (last 18 months) and focused on research in the following understudied areas: technology-driven interventions for informal caregivers; informal caregivers of older adults with cancer; interrelationship between informal caregiver and dyadic outcomes; and research priorities and guidelines to improve informal caregiver support. RECENT

findingsStudies focused on technology-driven informal caregiver interventions, with evidence of good feasibility and acceptability with benefits for burden and quality of life (QOL). Studies also focused on QOL for caregivers of older adults with cancer. Finally, research priorities and clinical guidelines were established through Delphi survey studies. SUMMARY: Despite the substantial evidence on informal cancer caregiving, more research is needed to further characterize caregivers at high risk for burden, explicate interrelationships between caregiver/patient outcomes, and test innovative and scalable interventions. Studies are also needed to understand the specific needs of informal caregivers in cancer surgery, an understudied treatment population.

Indexed as

AgingCaregiversFamilyHumansMental HealthNeoplasmsQuality of LifeStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID31157656
PMCPMC6669089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.