Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157410›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2019

Alternative Magnesium Sulfate Dosing Regimens for Women With Preeclampsia: A Population Pharmacokinetic Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation Study.

Lihong Du, Larissa A Wenning, Brendan Carvalho, Lelia Duley, Kathleen F Brookfield, Han Witjes, Rik de Greef, Pisake Lumbiganon, Vitaya Titapant, Kiattisak Kongwattanakul and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Lihong DuPPDM, QP2, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA.
Larissa A WenningPPDM, QP2, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA, USA.
Brendan CarvalhoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lelia DuleyNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kathleen F BrookfieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Han WitjesCertara Strategic Consulting, Oss, Netherlands.
Rik de GreefCertara Strategic Consulting, Oss, Netherlands.
Pisake LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Vitaya TitapantDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kiattisak KongwattanakulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Qian LongUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ussanee S SangkomkamhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Ahmet M GülmezogluUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olufemi T OladapoUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Khon Kaen University · THWorld Health Organization · CHUnited States Military Academy · USABS Consulting (United States) · USOregon Health & Science University · USSiriraj Hospital · THStanford Medicine · USThe Hague Centre for Strategic Studies · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnesium sulfate is the anticonvulsant of choice for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment; however, the recommended dosing regimens are costly and cumbersome and can be administered only by skilled health professionals. The objectives of this study were to develop a robust exposure-response model for the relationship between serum magnesium exposure and eclampsia using data from large studies of women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate, and to predict eclampsia probabilities for standard and alternative (shorter treatment duration and/or fewer intramuscular injections) regimens. Exposure-response modeling and simulation were applied to existing data. A total of 10 280 women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate or placebo were evaluated. An existing population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate individual serum magnesium exposure. Logistic regression was applied to quantify the serum magnesium area under the curve-eclampsia rate relationship. Our exposure-response model-estimated eclampsia rates were comparable to observed rates. Several alternative regimens predicted magnesium peak concentration < 3.5 mmol/L (empiric safety threshold) and eclampsia rate ≤ 0.7% (observed response threshold), including 4 g intravenously plus 10 g intramuscularly followed by either 8 g intramuscularly every 6 hours × 3 doses or 10 g intramuscularly every 8 hours × 2 doses and 10 g intramuscularly every 8 hours × 3 doses. Several alternative magnesium sulfate regimens with comparable model-predicted efficacy and safety were identified that merit evaluation in confirmatory clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAnticonvulsantsEclampsiaFemaleHumansMagnesium SulfatePre-EclampsiaPregnancyAnticonvulsantsMagnesium Sulfateeclampsiaexposure-responsemagnesium sulfatepopulation modelingpreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID31157410
PMCPMC6790709
OpenAlexW2949013248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.