Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157376›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2019

Incorporating costing study results into district and service planning to enhance immunization programme performance: a Zambian case study.

Isabelle Feldhaus, Carl Schütte, Francis D Mwansa, Masauso Undi, Stanley Banda, Chris Suharlim, Nicolas A Menzies, Logan Brenzel, Stephen C Resch, Anthony Kinghorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabelle FeldhausDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Carl SchütteStrategic Development Consultants, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Francis D MwansaDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Plot 12193, Woodlands Chalala, Lusaka, Zambia.
Masauso UndiIndependent consultant, 35 Nalikwanda Road, Woodlands, Lusaka, Zambia.
Stanley BandaIndependent consultant, Plot 34270, Shantumbu Road, Hillview Park, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chris SuharlimCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicolas A MenziesDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Logan BrenzelBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 500 Fifth Avenue N, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephen C ReschCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA.
Anthony KinghornPerinatal HIV Research Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Chris Hani Road, Diepkloof, Soweto, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Donors, researchers and international agencies have made significant investments in collection of high-quality data on immunization costs, aiming to improve the efficiency and sustainability of services. However, improved quality and routine dissemination of costing information to local managers may not lead to enhanced programme performance. This study explored how district- and service-level managers can use costing information to enhance planning and management to increase immunization outputs and coverage. Data on the use of costing information in the planning and management of Zambia's immunization programme was obtained through individual and group semi-structured interviews with planners and managers at national, provincial and district levels. Document review revealed the organizational context within which managers operated. Qualitative results described managers' ability to use costing information to generate cost and efficiency indicators not provided by existing systems. These, in turn, would allow them to understand the relative cost of vaccines and other resources, increase awareness of resource use and management, benchmark against other facilities and districts, and modify strategies to improve performance. Managers indicated that costing information highlighted priorities for more efficient use of human resources, vaccines and outreach for immunization programming. Despite decentralization, there were limitations on managers' decision-making to improve programme efficiency in practice: major resource allocation decisions were made centrally and planning tools did not focus on vaccine costs. Unreliable budgets and disbursements also undermined managers' ability to use systems and information. Routine generation and use of immunization cost information may have limited impact on managing efficiency in many Zambian districts, but opportunities were evident for using existing capacity and systems to improve efficiency. Simpler approaches, such as improving reliability and use of routine immunization and staffing indicators, drawing on general insights from periodic costing studies, and focusing on maximizing coverage with available resources, may be more feasible in the short-term.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisEfficiency, OrganizationalHealth PlanningDecision MakingHumansImmunization ProgramsInterviews as TopicPoliticsQualitative ResearchVaccinationVaccinesZambiaVaccinescostingdecentralizationdecentralized planning and decision-makingimmunization programmesRoutine immunizationZambia

Identifiers

PMID31157376
PMCPMC6736183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.