ArticleAdvances in methods and practices in psychological science2018
Practical Solutions for Sharing Data and Materials From Psychological Research.
Article in Advances in methods and practices in psychological science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transparency in epidemiological analyses of cohort data a case study of the Norwegian mother, father, and child cohort study (MoBa).BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.Journal of open psychology data · 2025Article
- Recommendations for reporting regression-based norms and the development of free-access tools to implement them in practice.PloS one · 2025Article
- Can I have your data? Recommendations and practical tips for sharing neuroimaging data upon a direct personal request.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Integrating open education practices with data analysis of open science in an undergraduate course.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Expanding the data Ark: an attempt to make the data from highly cited social science papers publicly available.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Demystifying the likelihood of reidentification in neuroimaging data: A technical and regulatory analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Are trajectories of personality and socioeconomic factors prospectively associated with midlife cognitive function? Findings from a 12-year longitudinal study of Mexican-origin adults.Psychology and aging · 2023Article
- Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Article
- A survey on the challenges, limitations, and opportunities of online testing of infants and young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: using our experiences to improve future practices.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Ethics challenges in sharing data from pragmatic clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022Article
- Is Collaborative Open Science Possible With Speech Data in Psychiatric Disorders?Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Open and reproducible science practices in psychoneuroendocrinology: Opportunities to foster scientific progress.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2022Review
- A How-To Guide for Open-Science Practices in Special Education Research.Remedial and special education : RASE · 2022Article
- Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022Article
- Daylong Mobile Audio Recordings Reveal Multitimescale Dynamics in Infants' Vocal Productions and Auditory Experiences.Current directions in psychological science · 2022Article
- Injury surveillance in community cricket: A new inning for South Africa.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2022Article
- Reproducible manuscript preparation with RMarkdown application to JMSACL and other Elsevier Journals.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widespread sharing of data and materials (including displays and text- and video-based descriptions of experimental procedures) will improve the reproducibility of psychological science and accelerate the pace of discovery. In this article, we discuss some of the challenges to open sharing and offer practical solutions for researchers who wish to share more of the products-and process-of their research. Many of these solutions were devised by the Databrary.org data library for storing and sharing video, audio, and other forms of sensitive or personally identifiable data. We also discuss ways in which researchers can make shared data and materials easier for others to find and reuse. Widely adopted, these solutions and practices will increase transparency and speed progress in psychological science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.