Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157309›Full record

ArticleEconometrics and statistics2017

Identifying gene-environment interactions for prognosis using a robust approach.

Hao Chai, Qingzhao Zhang, Yu Jiang, Guohua Wang, Sanguo Zhang, Syed Ejaz Ahmed, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Econometrics and statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Robust genetic interaction analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Review
  7. Robust gene-environment interaction analysis using penalized trimmed regression.Journal of statistical computation and simulation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao ChaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, United States.
Qingzhao ZhangSchool of Economics and Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, China.
Yu JiangSchool of Public Health, University of Memphis, United States.
Guohua WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Sanguo ZhangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Syed Ejaz AhmedDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Brock University, Canada.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, United States.

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Penalization methods for identifying gene envrionment interactions and applications to melanoma and other cancer typesR21CA191383 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2015 to 2017
$435k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many complex diseases, prognosis is of essential importance. It has been shown that, beyond the main effects of genetic (G) and environmental (E) risk factors, gene-environment (G × E) interactions also play a critical role. In practical data analysis, part of the prognosis outcome data can have a distribution different from that of the rest of the data because of contamination or a mixture of subtypes. Literature has shown that data contamination as well as a mixture of distributions, if not properly accounted for, can lead to severely biased model estimation. In this study, we describe prognosis using an accelerated failure time (AFT) model. An exponential squared loss is proposed to accommodate data contamination or a mixture of distributions. A penalization approach is adopted for regularized estimation and marker selection. The proposed method is realized using an effective coordinate descent (CD) and minorization maximization (MM) algorithm. The estimation and identification consistency properties are rigorously established. Simulation shows that without contamination or mixture, the proposed method has performance comparable to or better than the nonrobust alternative. However, with contamination or mixture, it outperforms the nonrobust alternative and, under certain scenarios, is superior to the robust method based on quantile regression. The proposed method is applied to the analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) lung cancer data. It identifies interactions different from those using the alternatives. The identified markers have important implications and satisfactory stability.

Indexed as

Exponential squared lossGene-environment interactionMarker identificationPrognosisRobustness

Identifiers

PMID31157309
PMCPMC6541416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.