ArticleEconometrics and statistics2017
Identifying gene-environment interactions for prognosis using a robust approach.
Article in Econometrics and statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MixedBayes: An R Package for Longitudinal Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis Using Robust Sparse Bayesian Mixed Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025Article
- Springer: An R package for bi-level variable selection of high-dimensional longitudinal data.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions With Robust Marginal Bayesian Variable Selection.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Robust genetic interaction analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Robust gene-environment interaction analysis using penalized trimmed regression.Journal of statistical computation and simulation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For many complex diseases, prognosis is of essential importance. It has been shown that, beyond the main effects of genetic (G) and environmental (E) risk factors, gene-environment (G × E) interactions also play a critical role. In practical data analysis, part of the prognosis outcome data can have a distribution different from that of the rest of the data because of contamination or a mixture of subtypes. Literature has shown that data contamination as well as a mixture of distributions, if not properly accounted for, can lead to severely biased model estimation. In this study, we describe prognosis using an accelerated failure time (AFT) model. An exponential squared loss is proposed to accommodate data contamination or a mixture of distributions. A penalization approach is adopted for regularized estimation and marker selection. The proposed method is realized using an effective coordinate descent (CD) and minorization maximization (MM) algorithm. The estimation and identification consistency properties are rigorously established. Simulation shows that without contamination or mixture, the proposed method has performance comparable to or better than the nonrobust alternative. However, with contamination or mixture, it outperforms the nonrobust alternative and, under certain scenarios, is superior to the robust method based on quantile regression. The proposed method is applied to the analysis of TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) lung cancer data. It identifies interactions different from those using the alternatives. The identified markers have important implications and satisfactory stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.