ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
Evaluation of the association between the -1304T>G polymorphism in the promoter of the
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in China. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4) regulates tumorigenesis as a component of the MKK4 pathway. A number of studies have suggested a correlation between the
methodsSystematic literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Four trials, including 1,255 cancer cases and 1,181 controls, were recruited in our study to assess the relationship of the
resultsFour studies met our inclusion criteria and were finally included in the analysis, involving 1,255 cancer patients and 1,181 controls. Our meta-analysis revealed that the
conclusionsIn conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.