Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157149›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2019

AOSpine-Spine Trauma Classification System: The Value of Modifiers: A Narrative Review With Commentary on Evolving Descriptive Principles.

Srikanth N Divi, Gregory D Schroeder, F Cumhur Oner, Frank Kandziora, Klaus J Schnake, Marcel F Dvorak, Lorin M Benneker, Jens R Chapman, Alexander R Vaccaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Adverse events after surgery for injuries to the subaxial cervical spine: analysis of incidence and risk factors.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Classifications In Brief: The Allen and Ferguson Classification.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical and radiological outcomes of one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage for three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures: a multicenter retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Srikanth N DiviRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gregory D SchroederRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
F Cumhur OnerUniversity Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Frank KandzioraBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Klaus J SchnakeSchön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
Marcel F DvorakVancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lorin M BennekerInsel Hospital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Jens R ChapmanHarborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexander R VaccaroRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · USBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main · DEHarborview Medical Center · USRothman Institute · USSchön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review.

objectivesTo describe the current AOSpine Trauma Classification system for spinal trauma and highlight the value of patient-specific modifiers for facilitating communication and nuances in treatment.

methodsThe classification for spine trauma previously developed by The AOSpine Knowledge Forum is reviewed and the importance of case modifiers in this system is discussed.

resultsA successful classification system facilitates communication and agreement between physicians while also determining injury severity and provides guidance on prognosis and treatment. As each injury may be unique among different patients, the importance of considering patient-specific characteristics is highlighted in this review. In the current AOSpine Trauma Classification, the spinal column is divided into 4 regions: the upper cervical spine (C0-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7), thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5), and the sacral spine (S1-S5, including coccyx). Each region is classified according to a hierarchical system with increasing levels of injury or instability and represents the morphology of the injury, neurologic status, and clinical modifiers. Specifically, these clinical modifiers are denoted starting with M followed by a number. They describe unique conditions that may change treatment approach such as the presence of significant soft tissue damage, uncertainty about posterior tension band injury, or the presence of a critical disc herniation in a cervical bilateral facet dislocation. These characteristics are described in detail for each spinal region.

conclusionsPatient-specific modifiers in the AOSpine Trauma Classification highlight unique clinical characteristics for each injury and facilitate communication and treatment between surgeons.

Indexed as

cervicallumbosacralspinal cord injuryspinal injuriesthoracolumbar

Identifiers

PMID31157149
PMCPMC6512201
OpenAlexW2944407548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.