Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157066›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2018

Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on antimicrobial use in a small 164-bed hospital.

Pedro Mas-Morey, Alfonso Ballesteros-Fernández, Elisabet Sanmartin-Mestre, Marta Valle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Untapped potential: exploring clinical pharmacists as antibiotic stewardship ambassadors.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Mas-MoreyDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Quirón Salud Palmaplanas, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Alfonso Ballesteros-FernándezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Quirón Salud Palmaplanas, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Elisabet Sanmartin-MestreDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Quirón Salud Palmaplanas, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Marta ValleDepartment of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònomade Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-251X
Clinica Rotger · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study the impact of clinical pharmacist interventions (PIs) on antimicrobial prescriptions in terms of physician acceptance rates, clinical benefits and antimicrobial use/cost outcomes.

methodsThis study retrospectively analysed the impact of antimicrobial PIs over a 2-year period (October 2012 to October 2014) in a private non-teaching 164-bed hospital without a formal antimicrobial stewardship programme. Excluded from the study were outpatients and patients admitted to the intensive care unit or the emergency department. The PIs focused on appropriate indication and appropriate dosage; drug adverse events, allergies, intolerance and interactions; sequential therapy; therapeutic de-escalation; excessive duration of treatment and therapeutic drug monitoring. Carbapenems and linezolid were classified as special-vigilance drugs. Amoxicillin-clavulanic, piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin were classified as preferred drugs. Clinical benefits evaluated in accordance with internal guidelines, were classified as enhancing appropriate antimicrobial prescription or potentially reducing toxicity. Antimicrobial use and expenditure were compared with that of the previous 2-year period.

results386 PIs were implemented in 303 patients. The overall acceptance rate was 83.4%. The acceptance rate for appropriate prescription PIs was significantly lower than for toxicity PIs (73.7% vs 90.9%; p<0.0001). Significant reductions in the use of special-vigilance drugs (from 39.9 (22.2-86.0) to 28.0 (6.0-43.4) defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days; p=0.0003) were seen and increases in the use of piperacillin-tazobactam (from 13.2 (0-22.9) to 17.2 (6.9-44.8) DDD/1000 patient-days; p=0.007) and of cephalosporins (from 123.5 (61.8-196.6) to 149.1 (80.3-228.2) DDD/1000 patient-days; p=0.027). Overall cost savings were 5.1%.

conclusionsPIs on antimicrobial prescriptions may be effective in enhancing appropriate use of antimicrobials, reducing their toxicity, reducing the use of special-vigilance drugs and reducing overall antimicrobial cost.

Indexed as

adverse eventsclinical pharmacyinfectious diseasespharmacotherapytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31157066
PMCPMC6457161
OpenAlexW2766803619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.