Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157060›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2018

The role of the clinical pharmacist in the NICU: a cross-sectional survey of Australian and Polish pharmacy practice.

Natalia Krzyżaniak, Iga Pawłowska, Beata Bajorek

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical pharmacists' services, role and acceptance: a national Swedish survey.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia KrzyżaniakDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health (Pharmacy), Sydney, Australia.
Iga PawłowskaDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8241-5909
Beata BajorekDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health (Pharmacy), Sydney, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe and compare the pharmaceutical services and clinical pharmacy roles performed in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Australian versus Polish hospitals.

methodsA 26-item survey was distributed electronically to directors of pharmacy as well as neonatal pharmacists in hospitals in Poland and Australia. Most questions were fixed 'agree/disagree' answers, supplemented by open-ended questions. The survey was distributed between January and May 2017.

resultsOverall, 30 Australian pharmacists and 22 Polish pharmacists completed the survey. Significant differences were observed in the types of pharmaceutical care services provided to NICUs between Australia and Poland. A higher proportion of Australians than Poles performed clinical roles: for example, providing medication recommendations (Aus=96.6%, Pol=9.1%, P<0.001); pharmaceutical interventions to resolve drug therapy problems (Aus=93.1%, Pol=18.2%, P<0.001); and general patient medication chart review (Aus=96.6%, Pol=13.6%, P<0.001). All (100%) Polish pharmacists did not consider themselves members of the NICU team and the majority (59.1%) felt that pharmaceutical care on the NICU was practically non-existent.

conclusionFuture research should focus on bringing practice in countries such as Poland closer in line with practice in countries such as Australia.

Indexed as

Clinical PharmacyInternational Health ServicesNeonatologyOrganisation Of Health ServicesQuality In Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31157060
PMCPMC6457158
OpenAlexW2784359205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.