Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31157008›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2018

Impact of fampridine on quality of life: clinical benefit in real-world practice.

María Belén Marzal-Alfaro, María Luisa Martín Barbero, JoseM García Domínguez, Fernando Romero-Delgado, María Luisa Martínez Ginés, Ana Herranz, María Sanjurjo-Sáez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel Analgesics with Peripheral Targets.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Belén Marzal-AlfaroPharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
María Luisa Martín BarberoPharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
JoseM García DomínguezNeurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Romero-DelgadoNeurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
María Luisa Martínez GinésNeurology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
Ana HerranzPharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.
María Sanjurjo-SáezPharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and tolerability of fampridine in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in real clinical practice and to analyse adherence to treatment and general satisfaction of patients in terms of quality of life (QOL).

methodsPatients who started treatment with fampridine from May 2014 to October 2014 were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) respectively, measured at baseline and 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Adherence was measured by the Morisky-Green questionnaire, patient satisfaction with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and QOL with improvement in mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort or anxiety/depression.

results30 patients (46.7% women) of mean age 39 years, mean MS duration 13.7 years, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score 5.8, 57% with relapsing-remitting MS were included. 22 patients (73%) continued to take treatment throughout the study period. Two weeks after treatment initiation all measures improved significantly from baseline (T25FW: -7.5 s, p<0.05; MSWS-12: -36.7, p<0.05). At 6 months, walking speed and self-perceived walking ability were significantly improved (T25FW: -3.8 s, p<0.05; MSWS-12: -30.0, p<0.05). Adverse events were reported by 30% of patients. Seizures were registered in one patient. 70% of patients were adherent with treatment. Median (IQR) general satisfaction VAS score was 8 (7-9). Patients reported an improvement in mobility (70%), anxiety/depression (33.3%), self-care (23.3%), daily activities (23.3%) and pain/discomfort (3.3%).

conclusionsFampridine is effective and safe in patients with MS in real clinical practice up to 6 months. Adherence to treatment was suboptimal but patients' general satisfaction was high and fampridine improved several items of QOL.

Indexed as

adherenceFampridinemultiple sclerosisquality of lifeWalking ability

Identifiers

PMID31157008
PMCPMC6452390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.