SynthesisEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2017
Incorrect aseptic techniques in medicine preparation and recommendations for safer practices: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an ultraviolet C device for hospital pharmacy compounding.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identifying factors associated with adherence to aseptic techniques in orthopedic dressing by nurses.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Ultraviolet C Decontamination Devices in a Hospital Pharmacy: An Evaluation of Their Contribution.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility Study of Purified and Low-Temperature-Sterilized Injectable Collagen for Soft Tissue Repair: Intramuscular Implantation in Rats.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sustainable application of biocides to promote hygiene and minimize antimicrobial resistance.Sustainable microbiology · 2024Review
- Enhancing Pain Relief in Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis: Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid Synergy.Cureus · 2023Review
- Preparation of COVID-19 vaccines in hospital pharmacies: a half-year report from Slovakia.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022Article
- Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022Article
- Article
- Retention of Sterile Compounding Knowledge Among Pharmacy Technicians.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021Article
- Compounding Parenteral Products in Pediatric Wards-Effect of Environment and Aseptic Technique on Product Sterility.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Personnel knowledge of intravenous admixtures: a survey in a government hospital.The Pan African medical journal · 2021Article
- Article
- Incorrect representation of aseptic techniques.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMany patient deaths have been reported because of administration of contaminated intravenous medicines due to incorrect aseptic techniques. Our aim was to review the literature for (1) incorrect practices in aseptic drug preparation and administration and (2) recommendations for safer practices in hospitals.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed covering 2007-2015. Studies were included if they concerned aseptic medicine preparation and administration in hospitals by different healthcare professionals, assessed incorrect practices and made recommendations for safer aseptic preparation and administration.
results26 studies were included of which 19 were original articles. 12 of the studies concerned description of incorrect practices that led to contamination. The studies reported 11 incorrect practices that increased the risk of contamination of parenteral medicines. The most reported incorrect practices were multiple use of phials and syringes (2/12 studies) and lack of overall disinfection during the aseptic preparation and administration (3/12 studies). 22 practices were recommended to avoid contamination, which were classified into six categories: equipment and medicines (7); disinfection (6); working environment (3); storing (3); catheter care (2) and quality of prepared medicines (1). The results indicate that pharmacists prepared syringes with less contamination than nurses because of the pharmacist's aseptic skills and environmental aspects in pharmacy units.
conclusionsThe review discusses many appropriate and enhanced practices in aseptic drug preparation and administration. As the change for the better in contamination rates of administered medicines seems to be challenging to achieve in hospitals, better and possibly international procedures for safe parenteral practices need to be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.