Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156751›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2019

Self-Myofascial Release Does Not Improve Back Squat Range of Motion, Alter Muscle Activation, or Aid in Perceived Recovery 24-Hours Following Lower Body Resistance Training.

Zach Beier, Ian Earp, J Adam Korak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zach BeierDepartment of Health & Exercise Science, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Ian EarpDepartment of Health & Exercise Science, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN, USA.
J Adam KorakDepartment of Health & Exercise Science, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN, USA.
University of St. Thomas - Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-myofascial release (SMR) is an alternative therapy believed to increase myofascial mobility by exciting muscles and increasing blood flow to the treated area. Previous literature suggest SMR produces conflicting results on performance, muscle activation, range of motion (ROM), and recovery. This study was designed to utilize SMR on a fatigued individual prior to exercise and measure its' effects on muscle activation, ROM, and perceived recovery compared to a dynamic warm-up session. The findings could help develop an efficient warm-up protocol for resistance-trained individuals. Electromyography (EMG) measured muscle activation of the rectus femoris (RF) and the gluteus maximus (GM), while a bluetooth goniometer assessed knee ROM during a submaximal back-squat. Eleven resistance trained participants (estimated squat 1RM 163% body weight) completed four total sessions of testing with sessions 1 and 3 solely used to induce muscle fatigue. In a counterbalanced design, participants during sessions 2 and 4 received either a dynamic standardized warm-up, or a SMR warm-up. Participants performed 10 repetitions of the back-squat at 70% estimated 1RM load. Peak and mean muscle activation of both muscles, knee ROM, and participants' perceived recovery was measured during the submaximal repetitions during sessions 2 and 4. Results indicated no significant differences between the dynamic warm-up and SMR warm-up among muscle activation, knee ROM, and participants perceived recovery (

Indexed as

electromyographyflexibilityFoam Rollingmuscle soreness

Identifiers

PMID31156751
PMCPMC6533090
OpenAlexW2964384528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.