Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156722›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2019

A Spatio-Temporal Model for Longitudinal Image-on-Image Regression.

Arnab Hazra, Brian J Reich, Daniel S Reich, Russell T Shinohara, Ana-Maria Staicu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arnab HazraNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Brian J ReichNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Daniel S ReichNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Russell T ShinoharaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ana-Maria StaicuNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
North Carolina State University · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Imaging Data in Curved SpaceR01MH086633 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI IBRAHIM, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2018
$2.9M
Statistical methods for large and complex databases of ultra-high-dimensionalR01NS085211 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Spatiotemporal Modeling of MRI Brain Lesion Trajectories of Biomarker DiscoveryR21NS093349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELOYAN, ANI, SHINOHARA, RUSSELL TAKESHI · 2016 to 2017
$454k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003119NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086633NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085211NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurologists and radiologists often use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS) because it is sensitive to inflammatory and demyelinative changes in the white matter of the brain and spinal cord. Two conventional modalities used for identifying lesions are T1-weighted (T1) and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging, which are used clinically and in research studies. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which is available only in research settings, is an advanced MRI modality that has been used extensively for measuring disease-related demyelination both in white matter lesions as well across normal-appearing white matter. Acquiring MTR is not standard in clinical practice, due to the increased scan time and cost. Hence, prediction of MTR based on the modalities T1 and FLAIR could have great impact on the availability of these promising measures for improved patient management. We propose a spatio-temporal regression model for image response and image predictors that are acquired longitudinally, with images being co-registered within the subject but not across subjects. The model is additive, with the response at a voxel being dependent on the available covariates not only through the current voxel but also on the imaging information from the voxels within a neighboring spatial region as well as their temporal gradients. We propose a dynamic Bayesian estimation procedure that updates the parameters of the subject-specific regression model as data accummulates. To bypass the computational challenges associated with a Bayesian approach for high-dimensional imaging data, we propose an approximate Bayesian inference technique. We assess the model fitting and the prediction performance using longitudinally acquired MRI images from 46 MS patients.

Indexed as

composite likelihooddynamic Bayesian updatinglongitudinal imaging studymagnetization transfer ratiomultiple sclerosisspatio-temporal regression modelT1-weightedT2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

Identifiers

PMID31156722
PMCPMC6537615
OpenAlexW2765742646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.