Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156557›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2019

The Role of 17β-Estradiol and Estrogen Receptors in Regulation of Ca

Shokoufeh Mahmoodzadeh, Elke Dworatzek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Aromatase enzyme: Paving the way for exploring aromatization for cardio-renal protection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Sex-specific virtual population for the prediction and assessment of arrhythmia risk.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Estrogen on Purinergic Signaling in Microvascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex differences in heart: from basics to clinics.European journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Sex differences in autonomic responses to stress: implications for cardiometabolic physiology.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shokoufeh MahmoodzadehDepartment of Molecular Muscle Physiology, Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Elke DworatzekDepartment of Molecular Muscle Physiology, Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous epidemiological, clinical, and animal studies showed that cardiac function and manifestation of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are different between males and females. The underlying reasons for these sex differences are definitely multifactorial, but major evidence points to a causal role of the sex steroid hormone 17β-estradiol (E2) and its receptors (ER) in the physiology and pathophysiology of the heart. Interestingly, it has been shown that cardiac calcium (Ca

Indexed as

cardiac Ca2+ ion channelcardiac mitochondrial functioncardiomyocytesestrogenestrogen receptorG-protein-coupled estrogen receptorsex difference

Identifiers

PMID31156557
PMCPMC6529529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.