Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2019

Testicular Cancer-Surgical Treatment.

Rodrigo Markus Vaz, Gustavo Bordenali, Mauro Bibancos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06864702 (The Construction and Effect Verification of a Deep Learning-based Automated Semantic Segmentation Model for Medical Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06864702 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Construction and Effect Verification of a Deep Learning-based Automated Semantic Segmentation Model for Medical Imaging: A Retrospective Case Analysis Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhujiang HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsArtificial Intelligence (AI), Deep Learning, Laparoscopic SurgeryArmsWhether the patient received diagnosis and treatment at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and retained medical images such as abdominal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Semen quality from patients affected by seminomatous and non-seminomatous testicular tumor.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo Markus VazDepartment of Urology, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Gustavo BordenaliDepartment of Urology, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Mauro BibancosDepartment of Urology, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (GCT) is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20-44. Men diagnosed with GCT have excellent survival rates due to advances in the multimodal treatment paradigm of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. When considering the adequate treatment, several variables should be investigated and known to select the proper procedure. Therefore, when considering Testicular Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia, organ-sparring treatment, such as radiotherapy or organ-sparring surgery should be considered, reaching a cure rate of 98%. However, when the case is of a seminoma or a non-seminoma, orchiectomy is usually the chosen procedure, reaching an oncological cure rate of 80-85%, when there is no metastasis. Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection (RPLND) is generally considered as a treatment option for non-seminomas, when lymph nodes are compromised. There are three different RPLND techniques: open, laparoscopic, and robotic. The open approach is as effective as the other two in its oncological efficiency. Although, when considering both laparoscopic and robotic approach, hospital stays are significantly reduced, better cosmetic results, and less complications when compared to the open approach. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches require extensive experience and have a steep learning curve, while also providing similar outcome, however, recent studies have been pointing out a slight increase of advantages on the robotic approach. Therefore, further studies are necessary to assert the robotic approach superiority. Also, it is noteworthy that new technologies are on the rise, improving the laparoscopic approach, requiring further studies after their uses are consolidated.

Indexed as

cancerdissectionlymph nodesurgicaltechniquestesticulartreatment

Identifiers

PMID31156556
PMCPMC6529845
OpenAlexW2945257922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.