ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Objective Estimation of Sensory Thresholds Based on Neurophysiological Parameters.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Single Dose of AC102 Reverts Tinnitus by Restoring Ribbon Synapses in Noise-Exposed Mongolian Gerbils.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- ABRpresto: An algorithm for automatic thresholding of the Auditory Brainstem Response using resampled cross-correlation across subaverages.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tinnitus is associated with increased extracellular matrix density in the auditory cortex of Mongolian gerbils.BMC neuroscience · 2024Article
- Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Objective hearing threshold identification from auditory brainstem response measurements using supervised and self-supervised approaches.BMC neuroscience · 2022Article
- Classification at the accuracy limit: facing the problem of data ambiguity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Preventive Effects of Ginkgo-Extract EGb 761Nutrients · 2022Article
- Circadian Sensitivity of Noise Trauma-Induced Hearing Loss and Tinnitus in Mongolian Gerbils.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Real-time threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses by cross-correlation analysis.iScience · 2021Article
- Simulated transient hearing loss improves auditory sensitivity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Salicylate-Induced Changes in Hearing Thresholds in Mongolian Gerbils Are Correlated With Tinnitus Frequency but Not With Tinnitus Strength.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Open(G)PIAS: An Open-Source Solution for the Construction of a High-Precision Acoustic Startle Response Setup for Tinnitus Screening and Threshold Estimation in Rodents.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Objective Estimation of Sensory Thresholds Based on Neurophysiological Parameters.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Let's See If You Can Hear: The Effect of Stimulus Type and Intensity to Pupil Diameter Response in Infants and Adults.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable determination of sensory thresholds is the holy grail of signal detection theory. However, there exists no assumption-independent gold standard for the estimation of thresholds based on neurophysiological parameters, although a reliable estimation method is crucial for both scientific investigations and clinical diagnosis. Whenever it is impossible to communicate with the subjects, as in studies with animals or neonates, thresholds have to be derived from neural recordings or by indirect behavioral tests. Whenever the threshold is estimated based on such measures, the standard approach until now is the subjective setting-either by eye or by statistical means-of the threshold to the value where at least a "clear" signal is detectable. These measures are highly subjective, strongly depend on the noise, and fluctuate due to the low signal-to-noise ratio near the threshold. Here we show a novel method to reliably estimate physiological thresholds based on neurophysiological parameters. Using surrogate data we demonstrate that fitting the responses to different stimulus intensities with a hard sigmoid function, in combination with subsampling, provides a robust threshold value as well as an accurate uncertainty estimate. This method has no systematic dependence on the noise and does not even require samples in the full dynamic range of the sensory system. We prove that this method is universally applicable to all types of sensory systems, ranging from somatosensory stimulus processing in the cortex to auditory processing in the brain stem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.