Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156303›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2019

Radiomic features from computed tomography to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas from non-invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules.

Ting Luo, Ke Xu, Zheng Zhang, Lina Zhang, Shandong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ting LuoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China.
Ke XuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China.
Lina ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110000, China.
Shandong WuDepartments of Radiology, Biomedical Informatics, Bioengineering, and Intelligent Systems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to investigate radiomic imaging features extracted in computed tomography (CT) images to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPAs) from non-IPAs appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules (GGNs), and to incorporate significant radiomic features with other clinically-assessed features to develop a diagnostic nomogram model for IPAs.

methodsThis retrospective study was performed, with Institutional Review Board approval, on 88 patients with a total of 100 part-solid nodules (56 IPAs and 44 non-IPAs) that were surgically confirmed between February 2014 and November 2016 in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. Quantitative radiomic features were computed automatically on 3D nodule volume segmented from arterial-phase contrast-enhanced CT images. A set of regular risk factors and visually-assessed qualitative CT imaging features were compared with the radiomic features using logistic regression analysis. Three diagnostic models, i.e., a basis model using the clinical factors and qualitative CT features, a radiomics model using significant radiomic features, and a nomogram model combining all significant features, were built and compared in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Decision curve analysis was performed for the nomogram model to explore its potential clinical benefit.

resultsIn addition to three visually-assessed qualitative imaging features, another three quantitative features selected from hundreds of radiomic features were found to be significantly (all P<0.05) associated with IPAs. The diagnostic nomogram model showed a significantly higher performance [area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.903] in differentiating IPAs from non-IPAs than either the basis model (AUC=0.853, P=0.0009) or the radiomics model (AUC=0.769, P<0.0001). Decision curve analysis indicates a potential benefit of using such a nomogram model in clinical diagnosis.

conclusionsQuantitative radiomic features provide additional information over clinically-assessed qualitative features for differentiating IPAs from non-IPAs appearing as GGNs, and a diagnostic nomogram model including all these significant features may be clinically useful in preoperative strategy planning.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomaslungRadiomicstomography; X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID31156303
PMCPMC6513736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.