Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156282›Full record

ArticleApplied psychological measurement2019

Looking at DIF From a New Perspective: A Structure-Based Approach Acknowledging Inherent Indefinability.

Anna Doebler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychological measurement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna DoeblerUniversity of Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF), although highly relevant for psychometric assessment in various fields of psychology, is mathematically not well-defined. Especially the impact, the difference between the means of the person parameters in the focal and the reference group, is a parameter that is not identified without further assumptions. Common DIF detection methods necessarily impose such assumptions, however, in most cases the specific constraints remain quite vague and are implicit in the mathematical algorithms. As an alternative, a structure-based approach is proposed that is independent of the impact and, therefore, not affected by the identification problem. The approach allows to (a) reveal all DIF-relevant information from the data, (b) define indices that quantify the amount of DIF in a test as a whole, and (c) perform item-level DIF analyses. For the last application, it is unavoidable to assume additional identification constraints. However, compared to other existing methods (which also rely on such constraints), the approach suggested here provides advantages as it is not only easier to perform but also much more transparent concerning its underlying assumptions.

Indexed as

differential item functioning (DIF)DIF structureeffect sizeidentification problemitem response theory (IRT)

Identifiers

PMID31156282
PMCPMC6512162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.