ArticleApplied psychological measurement2019
Looking at DIF From a New Perspective: A Structure-Based Approach Acknowledging Inherent Indefinability.
Article in Applied psychological measurement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Trends With Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Five IRT-Based Approaches.Educational and psychological measurement · 2026Article
- Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.Applied psychological measurement · 2021Article
- Differential Item Functioning Analysis Without A Priori Information on Anchor Items: QQ Plots and Graphical Test.Psychometrika · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential item functioning (DIF), although highly relevant for psychometric assessment in various fields of psychology, is mathematically not well-defined. Especially the impact, the difference between the means of the person parameters in the focal and the reference group, is a parameter that is not identified without further assumptions. Common DIF detection methods necessarily impose such assumptions, however, in most cases the specific constraints remain quite vague and are implicit in the mathematical algorithms. As an alternative, a structure-based approach is proposed that is independent of the impact and, therefore, not affected by the identification problem. The approach allows to (a) reveal all DIF-relevant information from the data, (b) define indices that quantify the amount of DIF in a test as a whole, and (c) perform item-level DIF analyses. For the last application, it is unavoidable to assume additional identification constraints. However, compared to other existing methods (which also rely on such constraints), the approach suggested here provides advantages as it is not only easier to perform but also much more transparent concerning its underlying assumptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.