Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31156168›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2019

Challenges to and Facilitators of Recruitment to an Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Clare Clement, Lucy E Selman, Patrick G Kehoe, Beth Howden, J Athene Lane, Jeremy Horwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experiences of Participation in a Multimodal Preventive Trial MIND-ADJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clare ClementBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lucy E SelmanBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Patrick G KehoeDementia Research Group, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Beth HowdenPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Athene LaneBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jeremy HorwoodBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Department of Health EME- 11/47/03Medical Research Council MC_PC_13088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow participation in clinical trials is a major challenge to advancing clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and care. Factors influencing recruitment to AD trials are not fully understood.

objectiveTo identify barriers to, and facilitators of, recruitment in a UK multi-center, secondary care AD trial (Reducing pathology in Alzheimer's Disease through Angiotensin TaRgeting (RADAR) trial) and implications for improving recruitment to AD trials.

methodsSemi-structured qualitative telephone interviews with a purposive sample of 17 trial site staff explored the RADAR trial recruitment pathway and views and experiences of recruitment. Interviews were analyzed thematically.

resultsDiagnostic and care pathways hindered identifying patients with mild-moderate AD, with a lack of up-to-date patient records and data access problems affecting screening. Research is not routinely embedded in AD care but facilitated recruitment when it was. Clinicians' and patients' favorable view of the trial purpose facilitated recruitment, although the complexity of participant information sheets and requirement for study companion created challenges.

conclusionThese findings have important implications for the design of future AD trials and for planning how to best interface with clinical commitments to ensure sufficient and timely recruitment. Challenges to AD trial recruitment can occur at care pathway, clinician, and patient and companion levels. Recruitment can be facilitated by: improving diagnostic processes and systems for recording and sharing patient information, embedding research into routine patient care, collaborating with a range of services to identify and approach eligible patients, training and engaging trial staff, and providing patients with clear and concise study information.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAlzheimer DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDementiahumanspatient carequalitative researchrandomized controlled trialresearch design

Identifiers

PMID31156168
PMCPMC6598018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.