ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2019
Living in Biological Darkness: Objective Sleepiness and the Pupillary Light Responses Are Affected by Different Metameric Lighting Conditions during Daytime.
Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light of both high and low melanopic illuminance improves alertness and attention during daytime.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Light exposure impact on cardiac autonomic control before and following exercise.Chronobiology international · 2025Article
- Living in Biological Darkness II: Impact of Winter Habitual Daytime Light on Night-Time Sleep.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Selecting, implementing and evaluating control and placebo conditions in light therapy and light-based interventions.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Towards an evidence-based integrative lighting score: a proposed multi-level approach.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Regulation of pupil size in natural vision across the human lifespan.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Brighter Time: A Smartphone App Recording Cognitive Task Performance and Illuminance in Everyday Life.Clocks & sleep · 2022Article
- Alerting effects of light in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Optimising metameric spectra for integrative lighting to modulate the circadian system without affecting visual appearance.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Effects of Daytime Electric Light Exposure on Human Alertness and Higher Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Anxiety and Motion Sickness Susceptibility May Influence the Ability to Update Orientation in the Horizontal Plane of Healthy Subjects.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Article
- Should We Re-think Regulations and Standards for Lighting at Workplaces? A Practice Review on Existing Lighting Recommendations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Effects of Narrowband Light on Choroidal Thickness and the Pupil.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- The Role of Daylight for Humans: Gaps in Current Knowledge.Clocks & sleep · 2020Article
- Perspective: Daylight Saving Time-An Advocacy for a Balanced View and against Fanning Fear.Clocks & sleep · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nighttime melatonin suppression is the most commonly used method to indirectly quantify acute nonvisual light effects. Since light is the principal zeitgeber in humans, there is a need to assess its strength during daytime as well. This is especially important since humans evolved under natural daylight but now often spend their time indoors under artificial light, resulting in a different quality and quantity of light. We tested whether the pupillary light response (PLR) could be used as a marker for nonvisual light effects during daytime. We also recorded the wake electroencephalogram to objectively determine changes in daytime sleepiness between different illuminance levels and/or spectral compositions of light. In total, 72 participants visited the laboratory 4 times for 3-h light exposures. All participants underwent a dim-light condition and either 3 metameric daytime light exposures with different spectral compositions of polychromatic white light (100 photopic lux, peak wavelengths at 435 nm or 480 nm, enriched with longer wavelengths of light) or 3 different illuminances (200, 600, and 1200 photopic lux) with 1 metameric lighting condition (peak wavelength at 435 nm or 480 nm; 24 participants each). The results show that the PLR was sensitive to both spectral differences between metameric lighting conditions and different illuminances in a dose-responsive manner, depending on melanopic irradiance. Objective sleepiness was significantly reduced, depending on melanopic irradiance, at low illuminance (100 lux) and showed fewer differences at higher illuminance. Since many people are exposed to such low illuminance for most of their day-living in biological darkness-our results imply that optimizing the light spectrum could be important to improve daytime alertness. Our results suggest the PLR as a noninvasive physiological marker for ambient light exposure effects during daytime. These findings may be applied to assess light-dependent zeitgeber strength and evaluate lighting improvements at workplaces, schools, hospitals, and homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.