Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31155922›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2019

Perforated diverticulitis in the North of England: trends in patient outcomes, management approach and the influence of subspecialisation.

T E Baldock, L R Brown, R C McLean

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T E BaldockCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK.
L R BrownHealth Education England North East, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
R C McLeanHealth Education England North East, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, several management options have been used in the management of perforated diverticulitis, ranging from conservative treatment to laparotomy. General surgery has also become increasingly specialised over time. This retrospective cohort study investigated changes in patient outcomes following perforated diverticulitis, management approach and the influence of consultant subspecialisation over time. MATERIALS AND

methodsData was collected on patients admitted with perforated diverticulitis in the North of England between 2002 and 2016. Subspecialisation was categorised as colorectal or other general subspecialties. The primary outcome of interest was overall 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes included surgical approach, stoma and anastomosis rate.

resultsA total of 3394 cases of perforated diverticulitis were analysed (colorectal,

conclusionThis study demonstrated considerable improvements in the management of perforated diverticulitis alongside the positive impact of subspecialisation on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalDisease ManagementDiverticulitis, ColonicEnglandFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRetrospective StudiesSpecializationSpecialties, SurgicalSurgical StomasManagement; SubspecialtyOutcomesPerforated diverticulitisSubspecialisation

Identifiers

PMID31155922
PMCPMC6818075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.