Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31155354›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Olfactory and Neuromodulatory Signals Reverse Visual Object Avoidance to Approach in Drosophila.

Karen Y Cheng, Rachel A Colbath, Mark A Frye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Odor tracking in flyingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Odor tracking in flyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Ecological cues orchestrate concerted courtship in abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Constitutive and Conditional Epitope Tagging of Endogenous G-Protein-Coupled Receptors inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen Y ChengDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
Rachel A ColbathDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
Mark A FryeDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA. Electronic address: frye@ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Odor-induced neuromodulation of visual valence switch in Drosophila melanogasterF31EY029599 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, YU-CHEN (KAREN) · 2018 to 2019
$73k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY029599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral reactions of animals to environmental sensory stimuli are sometimes reflexive and stereotyped but can also vary depending on contextual conditions. Engaging in active foraging or flight provokes a reversal in the valence of carbon dioxide responses from aversion to approach in Drosophila [1, 2], whereas mosquitoes encountering this same chemical cue show enhanced approach toward a small visual object [3]. Sensory plasticity in insects has been broadly attributed to the action of biogenic amines, which modulate behaviors such as olfactory learning, aggression, feeding, and egg laying [4-14]. Octopamine acts rapidly upon the onset of flight to modulate the response gain of directionally selective motion-detecting neurons in Drosophila [15]. How the action of biogenic amines might couple sensory modalities to each other or to locomotive states remains poorly understood. Here, we use a visual flight simulator [16] equipped for odor delivery [17] to confirm that flies avoid a small contrasting visual object in odorless air [18] but that the same animals reverse their preference to approach in the presence of attractive food odor. An aversive odor does not reverse object aversion. Optogenetic activation of either octopaminergic neurons or directionally selective motion-detecting neurons that express octopamine receptors elicits visual valence reversal in the absence of odor. Our results suggest a parsimonious model in which odor-activated octopamine release excites the motion detection pathway to increase the saliency of either a small object or a bar, eliciting tracking responses by both visual features.

Indexed as

OdorantsSignal TransductionAnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalDrosophila melanogasterNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsOctopamineVisual PerceptionNeurotransmitter AgentsOctopaminemultisensory integrationneuromodulationoctopamineTdc2valence reversal

Identifiers

PMID31155354
PMCPMC6615044
OpenAlexW2951486227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.