ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2019
Geographic Variation and Bias in the Polygenic Scores of Complex Diseases and Traits in Finland.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacogenomic scores in psychiatry: systematic review of current evidence.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Predicting the geographical distribution of drug use disorder in Sweden from the geographical variation in social deprivation, genetic risk and urbanization.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Genetic predisposition to longer lifespan, lifestyle factors, and all-cause mortality: a 17-year prospective cohort study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Integrating polygenic and methylation risk scores for pleural mesothelioma risk stratification.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Estimation of direct and indirect polygenic effects and gene-environment interactions using polygenic scores in case-parent trio studies.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Clinical use of polygenic risk scores: current status, barriers and future directions.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- S4-multi: Enhancing polygenic score prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Regional differences in the prevalence of obstetric complications in relation to maternal obesity and food purchases.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- Estimation of Direct and Indirect Polygenic Effects and Gene-Environment Interactions using Polygenic Scores in Case-Parent Trio Studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Regional Variations in the Incidence of Lichen Sclerosus in Sweden: Insights from a Nationwide Register Study (2001-2021).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Identification and functional characterisation of DNA methylation differences between East- and West-originating Finns.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Ancestral genetic components are consistently associated with the complex trait landscape in European biobanks.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- The geographical distribution of the family-genetic risk score for drug use disorder in Sweden and its co-localization with areas of social deprivation.Psychological medicine · 2024Article
- BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Cancer Risks and Management for Male Patients: A Review.JAMA oncology · 2024Review
- Forensic height estimation using polygenic score in Korean population.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Article
- Bayesian approach to assessing population differences in genetic risk of disease with application to prostate cancer.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Polygenic effects on the risk of Alzheimer's disease in the Japanese population.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Article
- Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.Genome medicine · 2024Review
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PSs) are becoming a useful tool to identify individuals with high genetic risk for complex diseases, and several projects are currently testing their utility for translational applications. It is also tempting to use PSs to assess whether genetic variation can explain a part of the geographic distribution of a phenotype. However, it is not well known how the population genetic properties of the training and target samples affect the geographic distribution of PSs. Here, we evaluate geographic differences, and related biases, of PSs in Finland in a geographically well-defined sample of 2,376 individuals from the National FINRISK study. First, we detect geographic differences in PSs for coronary artery disease (CAD), rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, waist-hip ratio (WHR), body-mass index (BMI), and height, but not for Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis. Second, we use height as a model trait to thoroughly assess the possible population genetic biases in PSs and apply similar approaches to the other phenotypes. Most importantly, we detect suspiciously large accumulations of geographic differences for CAD, WHR, BMI, and height, suggesting bias arising from the population's genetic structure rather than from a direct genotype-phenotype association. This work demonstrates how sensitive the geographic patterns of current PSs are for small biases even within relatively homogeneous populations and provides simple tools to identify such biases. A thorough understanding of the effects of population genetic structure on PSs is essential for translational applications of PSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.