ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019
Detecting genetic interactions using parallel evolution in experimental populations.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unique genetic bases of repeated life-history divergence associated with high altitude adaptation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Challenges and potential solutions for studying the genetic and phenotypic architecture of adaptation in microbes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- Article
- Overdominant and partially dominant mutations drive clonal adaptation in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Joint effects of genes underlying a temperature specialization tradeoff in yeast.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Changes in the distribution of fitness effects and adaptive mutational spectra following a single first step towards adaptation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Overdominant Mutations Restrict Adaptive Loss of Heterozygosity at Linked Loci.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Exploring a Local Genetic Interaction Network Using Evolutionary Replay Experiments.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Phenotypic and molecular evolution across 10,000 generations in laboratory budding yeast populations.eLife · 2021Article
- Baker's Yeast Clinical Isolates Provide a Model for How Pathogenic Yeasts Adapt to Stress.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2019Review
- Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes contain thousands of genes organized into complex and interconnected genetic interaction networks. Most of our understanding of how genetic variation affects these networks comes from quantitative-trait loci mapping and from the systematic analysis of double-deletion (or knockdown) mutants, primarily in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolve and re-sequence experiments are an alternative approach for identifying novel functional variants and genetic interactions, particularly between non-loss-of-function mutations. These experiments leverage natural selection to obtain genotypes with functionally important variants and positive genetic interactions. However, no systematic methods for detecting genetic interactions in these data are yet available. Here, we introduce a computational method based on the idea that variants in genes that interact will co-occur in evolved genotypes more often than expected by chance. We apply this method to a previously published yeast experimental evolution dataset. We find that genetic targets of selection are distributed non-uniformly among evolved genotypes, indicating that genetic interactions had a significant effect on evolutionary trajectories. We identify individual gene pairs with a statistically significant genetic interaction score. The strongest interaction is between genes TRK1 and PHO84, genes that have not been reported to interact in previous systematic studies. Our work demonstrates that leveraging parallelism in experimental evolution is useful for identifying genetic interactions that have escaped detection by other methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.