Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154981›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Detecting genetic interactions using parallel evolution in experimental populations.

Kaitlin J Fisher, Sergey Kryazhimskiy, Gregory I Lang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlin J Fisher1 Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University , Bethlehem, PA 18015 , USA.
Sergey Kryazhimskiy2 Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA 92093 , USA.
Gregory I Lang1 Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University , Bethlehem, PA 18015 , USA.
Lehigh University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Mapping genetic interactions between growth-promoting mutations in yeastR01GM127420 · NIGMS · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI LANG, GREGORY I · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes contain thousands of genes organized into complex and interconnected genetic interaction networks. Most of our understanding of how genetic variation affects these networks comes from quantitative-trait loci mapping and from the systematic analysis of double-deletion (or knockdown) mutants, primarily in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolve and re-sequence experiments are an alternative approach for identifying novel functional variants and genetic interactions, particularly between non-loss-of-function mutations. These experiments leverage natural selection to obtain genotypes with functionally important variants and positive genetic interactions. However, no systematic methods for detecting genetic interactions in these data are yet available. Here, we introduce a computational method based on the idea that variants in genes that interact will co-occur in evolved genotypes more often than expected by chance. We apply this method to a previously published yeast experimental evolution dataset. We find that genetic targets of selection are distributed non-uniformly among evolved genotypes, indicating that genetic interactions had a significant effect on evolutionary trajectories. We identify individual gene pairs with a statistically significant genetic interaction score. The strongest interaction is between genes TRK1 and PHO84, genes that have not been reported to interact in previous systematic studies. Our work demonstrates that leveraging parallelism in experimental evolution is useful for identifying genetic interactions that have escaped detection by other methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions'.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticCation Transport ProteinsComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGene Regulatory NetworksProton-Phosphate SymportersQuantitative Trait LociSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCation Transport ProteinsPHO84 protein, S cerevisiaeProton-Phosphate SymportersSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTRK1 protein, S cerevisiaeexperimental evolutiongenetic interactionsmutual informationparallel evolution

Identifiers

PMID31154981
PMCPMC6560277
OpenAlexW2948277993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.