Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154975›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Parallelism and convergence in post-domestication adaptation in cereal grasses.

M R Woodhouse, M B Hufford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Convergence and parallelism in the evolution of plant metabolism.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Population Genomics of DomesticatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M R WoodhouseIowa State University, Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology , Ames, IA 50011 , USA.
M B HuffordIowa State University, Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology , Ames, IA 50011 , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of desirable traits in crops during domestication has been well studied. Many crops share a suite of modified phenotypic characteristics collectively known as the domestication syndrome. In this sense, crops have convergently evolved. Previous work has demonstrated that, at least in some instances, convergence for domestication traits has been achieved through parallel molecular means. However, both demography and selection during domestication may have placed limits on evolutionary potential and reduced opportunities for convergent adaptation during post-domestication migration to new environments. Here we review current knowledge regarding trait convergence in the cereal grasses and consider whether the complexity and dynamism of cereal genomes (e.g., transposable elements, polyploidy, genome size) helped these species overcome potential limitations owing to domestication and achieve broad subsequent adaptation, in many cases through parallel means. This article is part of the theme issue 'Convergent evolution in the genomics era: new insights and directions'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, PhysiologicalCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenome SizePoaceaeSelection, Geneticadaptationconvergencedomesticationevolutionplants

Identifiers

PMID31154975
PMCPMC6560265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.