ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2019
Online patient feedback: a cross-sectional survey of the attitudes and experiences of United Kingdom health care professionals.
Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- Exploiting survey and online patient experience comments in general practice: validating a fine-tuned language model for automatic sentiment analysis.Family practice · 2026Article
- A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Developing a Tool for Assessing the Process of Seeking Health Information: Online Think-Aloud Method.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Developing a research community within an online healthcare feedback platform.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- A Pilot Study Conducting Online Think Aloud Qualitative Method during Social Distancing: Benefits and Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Turning the gaze: Digital patient feedback and the silent pathology of the NHS.Sociology of health & illness · 2022Article
- Exploring UK doctors' attitudes towards online patient feedback: Thematic analysis of survey data.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Implementing online patient feedback in a 'special measures' acute hospital: A case study using Normalisation Process Theory.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.