Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31154700›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2019

Functional Outcome after Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy by Destandau's Technique: A Prospective Study of 614 Patients.

Paresh Chandra Dey, Saurav Narayan Nanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paresh Chandra DeyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, AMRI Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Saurav Narayan NandaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, AMRI Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective study. Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of the lumbar discectomy procedure using the Destandau Endospine System by assessing the functional outcome and complication rate in 614 patients. Overview of Literature: Endoscopic Spine Surgery (Endospine) using Destandau's technique is an established treatment method of lumbar disk herniation; it was introduced in 1993 and is gaining prominence for its small skin incision and minimal tissue dissection with excellent visualization. Methods: Of 840 patients, we selected 614 patients, based on the strict inclusion criteria, who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) between August 2008 and November 2015. The technique comprised localization of the symptomatic level followed by insertion of an endospine system device through a 15-20-mm skin and fascial incision to perform a discectomy. We evaluated results by Macnab's criteria, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score after a minimum follow-up of 12 months and maximum up to 54 months. Results: Based on the modified Macnab's criteria, 479 patients (78.01%) exhibited excellent, 110 (17.9%) good, 19 (3.09%) fair, and 6 (0.97%) poor results. The average ODI score was improved from 64 (range, 44-86; standard deviation [SD]=9.2) to 14 (range, 2-31; SD=4.4), and the average VAS score from 7.8 (range, 6-10; SD=0.9) to 2 (range, 0-7; SD=1.2) in a year. On 1-year follow-up, 589 patients (95.9%) were completely pain-free and satisfied with the procedure. Conclusions: ELD provides a safe, effective, and minimal access corridor for lumbar discectomy. The technique also allows early postoperative mobilization and faster return-to-work.

Indexed as

DiskectomyEndoscopyEndospineMinimally invasive surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID31154700
PMCPMC6773994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.