ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019
The impact of distinct triple-negative breast cancer subtypes on misdiagnosis and diagnostic delay.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of MRI-based deep learning models in differentiation of triple negative breast cancer from other breast cancer subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- The application of computer-aided diagnosis in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasound training for residents-a randomized controlled study.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- BI-RADS-NET-V2: A Composite Multi-Task Neural Network for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Ultrasound Images With Semantic and Quantitative Explanations.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2023Article
- Survival outcome assessment for triple-negative breast cancer: a nomogram analysis based on integrated clinicopathological, sonographic, and mammographic characteristics.European radiology · 2022Article
- Luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype of triple-negative breast cancer: molecular, morphological, and clinical features.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2022Review
- Mammographic density to predict response to neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer therapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Postoperative Adjuvant Imatinib Therapy-Associated Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Racial Disparities in Diagnostic Delay Among Women With Breast Cancer.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021Article
- Review
- Which type of cancer is detected in breast screening programs? Review of the literature with focus on the most frequent histological features.Pathologica · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) includes mostly aggressive types of breast cancer with poor prognosis. Due to its growth pattern, misinterpretation in clinical imaging is more frequent than in non-TNBC. As the group of TNBC contains heterogeneous types of tumors, marker expression-based subtypes have recently been established. We analyzed clinical features and false-negative imaging findings that could potentially lead to diagnostic delay within the subtypes.
methodsAn exploratory analysis compared the imaging features across the a priori defined subtypes and related these findings to molecular subtype, disease stage, potential diagnostic delay, and patient outcome.
resultsTNBC cases were categorized into basal-like (BL; 38.6%), mesenchymal-like (ML; 19.9%), luminal androgen receptor (LAR; 28.3%), and immunomodulatory (IM; 13.3%) subtype. In almost every third patient, malignant classification was missed in at least one imaging method. Misclassification in mammogram was more frequent in ML, while benign ultrasound features were reported more often in the BL subtype. Diagnostic delay due to misclassification in imaging led to tumor growth and/or upgrading of the tumor stage in 8.9% of BL tumors, which had the lowest overall survivals. Despite misclassification rate was higher in the ML subtype it showed better outcomes. Misdiagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis was higher in LAR; however, this subtype showed a higher percentage of affected axillary lymph nodes.
conclusionTNBC subtypes have different clinical features, benign appearances, and diagnostic delay, which can lead to tumor stage upgrade. Future clinical studies on TNBC outcomes might consider the confounder of clinical delay in the subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.